Browse
Search
AGENDA - 04-20-2009 LEGISLATIVE MEETING INFORMATION
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-20-2009
>
AGENDA - 04-20-2009 LEGISLATIVE MEETING INFORMATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2009 11:14:47 AM
Creation date
4/23/2009 10:47:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/20/2009
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Previously, many C&D Landfill operators used good judgment and best management <br />practices in allowing construction and demolition type materials and other non <br />putrescible solid wastes such as same furniture, non-recyclable wood, rigid plastics, etc. <br />The purpose of this informal, land~li-operator-initiated expansion of accepted materials <br />was to preserve valuable lined landfill space, while at the same time maintaining <br />environmental integrity and rigorous oversight of the facility. while most metal, clean <br />woad and cardboard is recycled from our local C&D waste due to Urange County's <br />regulatory prohibition on landfilling these materials, other constructionwlike material is <br />frequently so heavily comna.ingled with the remaining non-construction site wastes, that it <br />will now no longer be technically classif ed as C&D. In staff s esti~.ation, and that of <br />many solid waste professionals and scientists, a discarded board, water hose or a plastic <br />bucket from a construction site is no different than an identical discarded board, water <br />base or plastic bucket from a dome Depot durnpster ar a citizen's garage. To many solid <br />waste professionals, it seems that the environmental properties of the material itself <br />should .determine the most effective and proper disposal rather than the origin of the <br />material, whereas it appears that the regulators have placed origin ahead of the nature of <br />the materials in im artiance of determining how materials are to be handled. <br />p <br />CJperational difficulties created for orange County by this change in enforcement are <br />substantive and adjustments will be required of customers accustomed to longstanding <br />landfill materials acceptance practices. The worl~ing face of the lined N~Sw landf ll will <br />became larger, requiring additional daily cover material. Managing this increased traffic <br />from conu~.ingling of smaller vehicles like the casual home-hauler in a pickup truck with <br />larger vehicles will create operational and staffing challenges. <br />Urange County has worked diligently for twenty years to reduce waste landfilled, <br />conserve landfill air space and increase recycling in every sector through a combination <br />of prograims, regulations, public education and techn~.cai innovation. The County's <br />environmental monitoring protocols include o~~site inspection of each load dumped and <br />our groundwater monitoring far exceeds State regulatory or general industry standards. <br />Last year, Grange County achieved its highest waste reduction rate ever at 48% per <br />capita. This new enforcement protocol will burden the County and its Landfill users <br />unnecessarily, take away daily operational judgments by .our on-thewground waste staff <br />and not necessarily achieve any greater envira~unental protection, while moving materials <br />out of our CAD waste stream, potentially escaping our C&D recovery efforts and <br />unnecessarily harming the County's waste reduction efforts. <br />while many conm.unities do not have access to C&D landfills and dispose of all wastes <br />into Municipal Solid waste ~MSw} landfills, others that da utilize C&D facilities may <br />wish to allocate wastes according to their specific properties and preserve landfill space <br />and minimize expenditures. The Solid waste Nianage~nent Act of Z00~' now requires <br />liners in ail new C&D landfills and makes them essentially equal to MSw landfills in <br />their level of protection. This makes the arbitrary distinction of using the source of <br />materials rather than the contamination potential of the waste materials even less <br />understandable. we suggest your consideration in recommending that our legislative <br />leaders consider inquiring about a potential change in the definition of C&D waste. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.