Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2009 10:27:48 AM
Creation date
4/20/2009 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
2009-020 Solid Waste - Coleman Gledhill Hargrave - Letter Agreement between Orange Co. and Womble Carlyle for special legal services
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2009
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While WTE as a means of dealing with Orange County's waste is very appealing and can <br />provide a means whereby Orange County maintains responsibility for its own waste <br />stream, there is no viable WTE technology that can solve our immediate or our medium- <br />term needs to dispose of solid waste. Technologies are either not proven at the <br />operational scale needed, or require significantly more feedstock than we have available <br />for cost effective operation. <br />® As a practical matter, it would be virtually impossible to successfully site a WTE or <br />similar facility in Orange County within a time frame that would make alternatives to the <br />transfer station possible. <br />® If a WTE facility were ultimately developed for Orange County's solid waste, it would in <br />all likelihood need to be located too far away for direct haul of waste, and even more <br />likely out of county as a regional facility, and thus require a WTS. <br />® The conclusions of the SWAB's memorandum to the BOCC dated September 24, 2008 <br />(attached) are even more germane now. <br />Conclusions <br />With respect to a WTS, despite the difficultyrn comparing the two methodologies for calculating <br />potential incremental costs involved in WTS versus out-of-county direct haul, it is the SWAB's <br />opinion that it is in the best interest of the citizens of Orange County to proceed forthwith with <br />procuring a site and developing a county owned and operated WTS that is not only operationally <br />sound and cost effective, but also environmentally and socially responsible. i <br />~. <br />With respect to WTE options, it is the SWAB's opinion that these may very well be viable long- <br />term options for disposal of Orange County's solid waste, likely as part of a regional agreement. <br />For the near and medium term, however, the primary focus of the SWAB's activities should <br />include: <br />• completion of the county-wide solid waste management plan, <br />• advising the Solid Waste Department on WTS development, <br />• continued development of our exemplary recycling operations, <br />• activities associated with landfill closure, and <br />• future continued discussions of WTE options, <br />in that order. <br />The Solid Waste Advisory Board hopes that this review is useful to you in your deliberations. <br />We look forward to hearing your response and are ready to continue to assist the BOCC and <br />Solid Waste staff. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.