Orange County NC Website
Memorandum <br />To: Board of Orange County Commissioners <br />From: Solid Waste Advisory Board <br />Jan F. Sassaman, PhD, Chair <br />Subject: SWAB Recommendations <br />Waste Transfer Station and Waste to Energy <br />Date: Apri12 2009 <br />At its January 22, 2009 meeting, the Board of Orange County Commissioners (BOCC) requested <br />that the Orange County Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) hold meetings with the public <br />stakeholders to: <br />• review and consider relative incremental costs to county and municipalities associated <br />with alternative primary disposal locations (i.e., Howell Site, Durham Transfer Station, <br />Waste Industries, etc.); and <br />• explore in more detail potential options for alternatives to landfilling, especially waste to <br />energy (WTE) alternative including those proposed by Orange County Voice (OCV), <br />and to report back to the BOCC at your meeting April 21, 2009. We have held three meetings <br />~ focusing on the financial issues, some extending beyond scheduled closing, listened to <br />consultants, potential vendors, and citizens, and have reached several preliminary conclusions <br />and .consequent recommendations contained herein. <br />Waste Transfer Station <br />At our February 5 meeting, we heard from OCV of their interest in looking at vendors to handle <br />Orange County's waste in lieu of a county-owned waste transfer station (WTE), and that there is, <br />in OCV's opinion, no need to rush to develop the Howell site. On March 31, we received and <br />reviewed cost analyses from Olver, Inc. and from OCV comparing the incremental costs <br />associated with direct haul to the Howell site and to two out-of-county locations. The Olver, Inc. <br />report demonstrated that while it may be less expensive to haul to Durham for the initial couple <br />of years, in the long run, there are significant savings associated with a county WTS facility. <br />OCV's opinion and analysis did not agree with Olver's analysis. <br />Waste-to-Energy <br />At our March 5 and April 2 meetings, SWAB heard from OCV, a potential vendor <br />(Wheelabrator/Waste Management), a public interest group (Blue Ridge Environmental Defense <br />League), and Olver, Inc. (summary of telephone conversations with additional WTE/alternative <br />technology interests). What the SWAB heard can be briefly summarized as follows: <br />