Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2009 10:27:48 AM
Creation date
4/20/2009 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
2009-020 Solid Waste - Coleman Gledhill Hargrave - Letter Agreement between Orange Co. and Womble Carlyle for special legal services
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2009
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br />To: Board of Orange County Commissioners <br />From: Solid Waste Advisory Board <br />Jan F. Sassaman, PhD, Chair <br />Subject: SWAB Recommendations <br />Waste Transfer Station and Waste to Energy <br />Date: Apri12 2009 <br />At its January 22, 2009 meeting, the Board of Orange County Commissioners (BOCC) requested <br />that the Orange County Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) hold meetings with the public <br />stakeholders to: <br />• review and consider relative incremental costs to county and municipalities associated <br />with alternative primary disposal locations (i.e., Howell Site, Durham Transfer Station, <br />Waste Industries, etc.); and <br />• explore in more detail potential options for alternatives to landfilling, especially waste to <br />energy (WTE) alternative including those proposed by Orange County Voice (OCV), <br />and to report back to the BOCC at your meeting April 21, 2009. We have held three meetings <br />~ focusing on the financial issues, some extending beyond scheduled closing, listened to <br />consultants, potential vendors, and citizens, and have reached several preliminary conclusions <br />and .consequent recommendations contained herein. <br />Waste Transfer Station <br />At our February 5 meeting, we heard from OCV of their interest in looking at vendors to handle <br />Orange County's waste in lieu of a county-owned waste transfer station (WTE), and that there is, <br />in OCV's opinion, no need to rush to develop the Howell site. On March 31, we received and <br />reviewed cost analyses from Olver, Inc. and from OCV comparing the incremental costs <br />associated with direct haul to the Howell site and to two out-of-county locations. The Olver, Inc. <br />report demonstrated that while it may be less expensive to haul to Durham for the initial couple <br />of years, in the long run, there are significant savings associated with a county WTS facility. <br />OCV's opinion and analysis did not agree with Olver's analysis. <br />Waste-to-Energy <br />At our March 5 and April 2 meetings, SWAB heard from OCV, a potential vendor <br />(Wheelabrator/Waste Management), a public interest group (Blue Ridge Environmental Defense <br />League), and Olver, Inc. (summary of telephone conversations with additional WTE/alternative <br />technology interests). What the SWAB heard can be briefly summarized as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.