Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2009 10:27:48 AM
Creation date
4/20/2009 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
2009-020 Solid Waste - Coleman Gledhill Hargrave - Letter Agreement between Orange Co. and Womble Carlyle for special legal services
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2009
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />^ The biomass typically used for feedstock in this process is plant matter, coal, or natural <br />gas. <br />^ Although MSW may potentially be used as a feedstock, there has been limited research or <br />testing with MSW; and there have been no full-scale facilities developed using MSW as a <br />feedstock. <br />~^® ®~S~A:~/AT'®IVS- AN® ~+®NCLUSI®NS <br />The results of our conversations with representatives of these various organizations, supported by <br />available published literature, were reasonably consistent and in agreement with the 2008 GBB <br />report. These results can be summarized by the following. <br />^ The overwhelming consensus was that mass-burn technology is the only proven <br />technology that is economically viable at this time. <br />^ There is considerable interest at this time in gasification technologies, and a more proven <br />track record with MSW is likely to be tested over the next several years. <br />^ Facilities sized approximately 1000 to 1200 TPD or larger are most likely to be feasible, <br />while facilities smaller than 800 to 900 TPD are not likely to be economically feasible <br />using the best technology. <br />^ A feasible project for Orange County would require a regional facility that imports MSW <br />from surrounding jurisdictions. <br />^ The siting, permitting, and construction costs of a new WTE facility would vary with <br />technology, location, and capacity. However, capital cost estimates based on previously <br />implemented projects range from $150,000 to $300,000 per design TPD capacity - <br />resulting in a $150 million to $360 million facility; <br />^ There have been no successfully implemented WTE projects in the United States for more <br />than 12 years. However, a regional mass-burn facility is being implemented by the <br />NMVUDA that is expected to be 1500 TPD and cost $500 million -equivalent to $333,000 <br />per design TPD capacity. <br />^ Although operating costs vary with technology, typical costs for Orange County are <br />expected to be in excess of $100 per ton, plus hauling and transfer costs unless the WTE <br />facility is sited in Orange County. <br />^ Once a site and project financing are secured and all contracts are final for a facility to be <br />developed, permitting and construction is expected to take approximately four to five <br />years assuming no permitting delays. <br />7 Apri116, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.