Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2009 10:27:48 AM
Creation date
4/20/2009 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
2009-020 Solid Waste - Coleman Gledhill Hargrave - Letter Agreement between Orange Co. and Womble Carlyle for special legal services
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2009
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ ~ - - - - <br />The. capital costs for these. facilities (mass-burn and RDF facilities) range from $150,000 to <br />$250,000 per design ton on a daily basis (TPD) and are generally considered feasible at plants <br />sized at 1000 to 1200 TPD. However, somewhat smaller facilities may be feasible in certain <br />circumstances, such as where high energy revenue is achievable. Regardless, amass-burn or RFD <br />facility would require a significant regional involvement as an approach to long-term disposal. <br />With operating costs and the sale of recovered energy and materials, the total net tipping fee for a <br />facility of this type would be approximately $100 per ton or more. <br />2.3 Gasification, Pyrolysis, and Plasma Arc <br />These technologies are grouped together because, unlike the first two technologies that combust <br />the waste material, these have similar processes that produce a combustible gas that is then burned <br />to generate energy. <br />^ Waste is heated to produce a burnable gas that can be used off site of the gasifier. <br />^ With gasification and pyrolysis, waste is fed into a gasification chamber, where it is heated <br />in an atmosphere sufficient only to maintain the gasification process (insufficient for <br />combustion) at temperatures in excess of 3000°F. <br />Plasma arc technologies direct intense heat at a relatively small area within a chamber, <br />i <br />where waste is converted to a gas in a starved-air atmosphere similar to other gasification <br />technologies. The intense heat is generated by "torches" that are fed by electrical current. <br />The current heats a process gas to more than 5000°F, which in turn heats waste. <br />^ At these high temperatures, organic materials dissociate into gases and non-organics will <br />vitrify into aglass-like slag or frit. <br />^ The slag can be used in light construction applications. <br />^ The gas can be piped to a combustion facility where it is burned much like natural gas in a <br />boiler or engine. <br />^ Air emissions are improved over waste combustion technologies. <br />^ Different forms of these technologies have been tested at various levels since the 1970s. <br />^ Although pilot plants have been tried with these technologies and small facilities operate <br />in Japan and Canada, performance has not yet been demonstrated with typical MSW over <br />long-term operating periods, nor on a scale that is applicable as a solution for MSW <br />management. <br />^ Plasma arc facilities have been recently planned for Tallahassee (1000 TPD) and St. Lucie <br />County (3000 TPD) in Florida. However, the Tallahassee project has been cancelled for <br />®`'~y~~ ~~~'P <br />5 Apri116, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.