Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 4:53:15 PM
Creation date
4/17/2009 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
ORD-2009-027 Resolution Amending the County Flood Damage Prevention Subdivision Zoning Atlas Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
RES-2009-027a Flood Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
]:2/12/2096 TU8 i6: 48 FAZ <br />- - ~ X86 <br />_ 3 .- <br />.. ~ ~ <br />' { <br />. Page 3 of 8 ~ - , <br />• ~ liabilitis>s that have accrued thereunder are reserved and maty be enforced. The enactament <br />of this ordinance shall not affocf any action, salt ~ pt+ocxeding institi+ated or pending. All <br />psanvisiaass of the flood d~$raage prevention vrdisnarsu:e of _ j <br />- ~ (~~). ~~# ~ - ~ ~ _ (aigirral adoption date of <br />. ~ -Chia ordinance}. as amerederL which ate not raxaaated hareun are repeated. Sec Assticle 6, ~ ~ <br />_ Section A,of the North Carolina Flood Damage Prevention tlydins3ave, (Eu6phasis s <br />-added}, ~ - j <br />i <br />& The Nations[ Flood Iasarance Psagram, <br />,, <br />The National Flarod Insrirance Frugram ~} at 42 U.S.C. 40Q1 ~. seq., seep "as a i <br />. ~ ~ matter of national policy, a reasonable method of sharing the risk of Flood lasses ... through a ~ 1 <br />program of flood insurances which.can complement and es~ourage preventive and protective - <br />- measures." Spscifita!!y, the NFfl''s piutpose is to :.. ~ ~ ' <br />. . (3) r~nire states or lava! conrit<unities, ass a condition of fntu~e Federal financial ~ <br />assistance; to participate is the flood insurance prog<atn s~ Lo adopt adesXuate { <br />. . ~ floodplain osrd~ances with effactiva enaffarcement provisions consistent with <br />Federal attaridards to reducx or avoid~futsarre flood losses ..•.. 42 US.C. 4002. . <br />- i <br />ItEMA irirplexhents rhea: NFIP. FIINA is authoxixed bo matke flood instrran~ce arvaila~ie otsty iri <br />. ~ ebatrmreniti~ that have adopted fioodpisin ruanagetne~ regulations that rout minirniurn NF1P ~ j <br />standards and.t7mt. are anforcing.thot;e aregulattions~ is flood Ira2ard areas. 'The NP'1P Act provides <br />'tl>lal After December 3I , 1971, rsso nevv flood instu~noe coverage sha11 be provided undue this i <br />title in any amen (or sanbdivisioir thereof) unless an appropriates public body shall have adopted <br />•• adequate land•vse and coradrol measures (varlth eff$ctive esarforceinea~ provisions) ovhich the 1 <br />Diss+~tor finds are consistent with.the comparel-ensive cariteria for land management and ure under ~ <br />. .. , <br />. <br />C.. I.eg[slative Power of the Stafe Vested to tie Lepslatnre. <br />The l+torth Carolina Constitution pravidcs that the tegisiatirres power of the Stott is vested <br />• in the General Assembly. N.C: Const. art. II, § t. Narr~lly, le~istative power canna[ be ~ • <br />delegated except as authorised 5y the Constitution. ; t ex reL '~g~1or v. Carolina Rasing <br />Assn. 241 N.C. 80, 84 S.E.2d 390 (1954); ~Claes v City of Radsviile. 264 N.C. 581,153 <br />. S.E.2d 139 (1967). Alfhougl! this legistastive power vests•tarchrsive~y lit the [~ieral Assembly <br />and may not be delegated, these is an exception to this~rale: as it pertains to cities, towns, or <br />counties. , [.Ate a 1, Tay~~ v Carolina itacina Ass_n•?kl N.C. 80,84 S.E.2d 39Q (1954): - <br />Gardner v_Crtvof Reidsville 26'3 N.C: 581, >•53 S.E.2d 139 (1967).- 1'owermay bedeiegated to . <br />• municipalities and the uordinaryrestrictions with respect to the rtelegation ofpower do not <br />• apply po cities, towns, or cowxtes." ~ensamer v. Matthe~vsorS, 281 H.C. 72x,140 SE.2d 2Q4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.