Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 4:53:15 PM
Creation date
4/17/2009 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
ORD-2009-027 Resolution Amending the County Flood Damage Prevention Subdivision Zoning Atlas Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
RES-2009-027a Flood Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 2 3 6 2 In addition to the standards contained within Section 2.3.6.1, any request <br />for a variance from the Special Flood Hazard Area Overlay Zoning District shall abide by <br />the following additional criteria: <br />a. Variances may be issued for the r~air or rehabilitation of historic structures <br />upon the determination that the proQosed repair or rehabilitation will not <br />preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure and the <br />variance is the minimum necessar~to preserve the historic character and <br />design of the structure. <br />b. In passing_upon such variances the appeal board shall consider all technical <br />evaluations all relevant factors all standards specified in other sections of this <br />Ordinance, and: <br />i. The danger that materials ma~,be swept onto other lands to the iniurv <br />of others; <br />ii. The danger to life and propertXdue to flooding or erosion damage; <br />iii. The susc~tibili~ of the proposed facility and its contents to flood <br />damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; <br />iv. The importance of the services,provided by the proposed facility to the <br />Orange County: <br />v. The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; <br />vi. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding or <br />erosion damage, for the proposed use; <br />vii. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated <br />development: <br />viii. The relationship of the proposed use to the Orange County <br />Comprehensive Plan and floodplain mana eg ment program for that <br />area; <br />ix. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and <br />emergency vehicles; <br />x. The expected heights velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment <br />transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if <br />applicable, expected at the site; <br />xi. The costs of providing~,governmental services during and after flood <br />conditions including maintenance and repair of public utilities and <br />facilities such as sewer,~as, electrical and water systems, and streets <br />and brid eg s; and <br />xii. The request for a variance is not after-the-fact or for a situation of <br />one's own making. <br />c. A written report addressing each of the above factors shall be submitted with <br />the application for a variance. <br />d. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purposes of this <br />Ordinance the appeal board may attach such reasonable conditions to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.