Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 4:53:15 PM
Creation date
4/17/2009 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
ORD-2009-027 Resolution Amending the County Flood Damage Prevention Subdivision Zoning Atlas Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
RES-2009-027a Flood Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
72 <br />Glenn Bowles: You are correct <br />Michael Harvey: We have been directed to address the County Attorney's concern and this is the method we are <br />using. <br />Judith Wegner. On page 47, part I, Section 1.5 reads Provisions of this ordinance adopted do not apply to bonafide <br />farms as defined except as follows; in a non-farm use of farm property, which is outside the zones. It looks the County <br />Attorney has crafted this to be spedfic to say that no, you don't have to comply with the rest of the zoning provisions, <br />however, as I understand it, in order for unto be compliant, he has carved an exception saying that so far as the fads <br />require it of you in a bonafide farm, which we cannot tell the fads. 1 think it is a reasonably well crafted way to try to <br />make an exception to honor the statues and the obligation if we want people to have eligibility. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: I would like to publicly thank Glenn. Several of my neighbors received this post card and I got calls so <br />I came to Glenn and he gave me six or seven pages as an explanation. There have been some excellent points <br />brought up. If we decided or recommended to the board that we do nothing, what is the downside? <br />Glenn Bowles: The County Board can take the non-vote and take it into consideration when they do what they have to <br />do. If we do nothing at all and just make FEMA changes, we would have to go bads to Public Hearing because they <br />were very specific about what we were and were not changing. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: What is the implication to the 35 who have flood insurance? <br />Glenn Bowles: If the programs were suspended and they wanted to buy flood insurance, they now have been <br />grandfathered in; they would not qualify for preferred rates. It may double the premium. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: So it is in the interest of the people who have building that are in the flood plane as defined by FEMA <br />for us to make these changes otherwise, their insurance cost to the Federal government could potentially double. <br />Tommy McNeill: What is the impact of what Samantha is discussing? How does that change the dynamics of your <br />presentation? What is the impact of her statements in regards to the changes? <br />Glenn Bowles: Should that private road been non-existent last year and they wanted to build it today, they would have <br />to get a no rise certificate through FEMA. I am only involved in seeing it and signing off on the findings of the engineer <br />or surveyor. All the work is approved at a federal level. We, as staff, are only involved if we see a situation like that, <br />we make sure the owner knows the ramifications of the situation. There have been four studies done and a fifth on my <br />desk today. Our involvement is minimal. We don't require these unless we see a violation. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: Is it possible to write a dause to address Samantha's question. I have a stream running through my <br />property and while it is not designated, let's say hypothetically does, and say that t have a road that goes through: it <br />with a small covert that has not flooded out It appears from the discussion that I wanted to add an inch of gravel to <br />that road; I would have to incur fairly significant costs from a study? <br />Glenn Bowles: Yes. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: That is not right. We have to accommodate them making some modification that road without <br />spending $30,000. That is part of the obligation this board has. <br />MOTION made by Judith Wegner to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that they adopted the <br />proposed ordinance that begins on page 47. We request staff to review whether additional modifications may be <br />warranted in Section 6.32.6 and Section 6.32.7 to provide waivers of requirements of extensive engineering <br />studies in the event of the need to introduce fill but have minimal impact on other properties in the area. <br />Seconded by Larry Wright. <br />Judith Wegner: My reasons are taking something that has been one format into another format so it is not a <br />matter of introducing new added requirements but simply trying to conform to the FEMA requirement even if it is <br />silly. I think people are entitled to have flood insurance. I appredate what is said about farms but I think the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.