Orange County NC Website
68 <br />• Concems with an elevation certificate with which the County assisted. <br />• Experience with the County elevation certificate surveying and the COMA and the need for ground frothing <br />with the maps. <br />• Experiences with an insurance carrier and the need to notify persons affected by changes in flood maps and <br />the acxuracy of such data. <br />• General discussions regarding how the proposed change would affect an individual's ability to improve one's <br />property. <br />Staff response to these comments and concems: <br />• Flood Damage Prevention standards and the Flood Insurance Rate Maps will not be changed, except to <br />place them within the Zoning Ordinance and Atlas. Property values and the ability to improve an individual's <br />property remain exactly as they are now. The public interest is served by this change and no contractual <br />arrangements will be affected. <br />• The Lake Orange area's long-standing concems involve docks.and stream buffers and are not affected by <br />this proposed change. <br />• The text amendments were available to the public on February 11 and were posted to the County's website <br />on February 13, 2009. <br />• The accuracy of the mapped floodplains is always in question. FEMA recognizes this and has developed <br />and protocol through the approval process for a Letter of Map Amendment (COMA). Five property owners <br />have taken advantage of this approval process in Orange County since February 2007. Floodplain <br />elevations were plotted out using the best available technology for watershed-wide topographic <br />determinations - LIDAR. This is the same technology used by NASA and is in wide use throughout the world <br />today. <br />The topographic coverages found in the county's GIS are generally accurate, but not to an engineering <br />standard. The county GIS topographic maps were not used to compute the base flood elevations. The flood <br />elevations are much more accurate, but are not a substitute for on-ground three-dimensional surveying to <br />determine predse topographic contours of the floodplain. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: While there will be no finandal impacts associated with the implementation of amendments to <br />the Subdivision Regulations, Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Atlas, Section 20.6.3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires <br />that all properties affected by a Zoning Atlas amendment and all properties within 500 feet of an affected property be <br />sent notifications. Over $10,000 was spent to mail out 6,531 postcards and 1-,826 certified letters. This cost indudes <br />$640 in materials (labels, paper, postcards and envelopes), $7,448 for postage, and $2,100 in staff time. <br />However, not making the revisions to the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance may put the County at risk of losing its <br />FEMA accreditation. <br />RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends the Planning Board: <br />Receive the February 23, 2009 BOCC referral; <br />2. Make recommendations back to the BOCC in time for the agenda process for the April 21, 2009 BOCC <br />meeting regarding: <br />a. Incorporating the amended FDPO text into the Zoning Ordinance text; <br />b. Making bona fide farming operations subject to Special Flood Hazard Area Overlay District <br />standards, regulations, procedures, and definitions; <br />c. Creating a new Zoning Overlay District - Specal Flood Hazard Areas (SERA); <br />d. Affirming the various amendments to the FIRM (future SFHA Overlay District) that FEMA approved <br />on February 2, 2007; and <br />e. Correcting definitions and references in the Subdivision Regulations to reflect FDPO terminology. <br />