Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009
>
Agenda - 04-21-2009 - 5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 4:53:15 PM
Creation date
4/17/2009 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
ORD-2009-027 Resolution Amending the County Flood Damage Prevention Subdivision Zoning Atlas Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
RES-2009-027a Flood Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
67 <br />5. Correcting definitions and references in the Subdivision Regulations to reflect FDPO terminology. <br />From time to time FEMA and its Cooperating Technical State partner, the State of North Carolina Division of <br />Emergency Management, approve Letters of Map Amendment (COMA), Letters of Map Revision (LOMR), and <br />Summaries of Map Action (SOMA). Since the adoption of the new FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS), <br />which became effective on February 2, 2007, FEMA has approved five (5) LOMAs, four (4) LOMR, and one (1) <br />Summary of Map Amendment. The primary objection FEMA voiced to the Orange County FDPO was that these <br />corrections to the FIRM were not specifically listed in the ordinance. <br />A LOMR alters the base flood elevation of the floodplain and the underlying Flood Insurance Study, by lowering or <br />raising the elevation. It is required for any stream crossing or dam removal involving a mapped special flood hazard <br />area (floodplain). LOMRs physically and legally alter FEMA FIRMs. The applicant must notify all surrounding property <br />owners by mail and perform detailed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses to document the alterations. <br />A COMA is an acknowledgement by FEMA that the mapped floodplain does not reflect the true base flood elevation, as <br />applied to a specific house or accessory building. They are applied for when a property owner believes his or her <br />house, garage, barn, or other structure is inappropriately mapped within a floodplain. An elevation certificate is <br />required to verify the owner's assertions. One of the results of the 2007 BOCC-funding floodplain surveying program is <br />that four property owners were able to receive LOMR approvals that effectively removed their houses from a mapped <br />floodplain. The FIRM and the underlying Flood Insurance Study does not change, but the flood insurance status for <br />the house or accessory structure does. In the case of the Cates Creek Parkway FIRM, before the engineer could <br />determine the correct hydrology and stream hydraulics for the new stream crossing, the flood mapping data had to be <br />corrected. <br />Keeping all FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps updated and current is an important maintenance and public <br />information task. Orange County is interested in the latest SOMA only because the FEMA FIRM panel letter suffix has <br />changed and this affects that portion of the FIRM panel within the County's zoning jurisdiction. <br />For informational purposes a draft Fooodplain Development Permit form is included as Attachment 6. <br />Attachment 7 lists all the sections of the existing FDPO and the proposed locations of each section in the amended <br />Zoning Ordinance. <br />Summary of the February 23, 2009 Quarterly Public Hearing: <br />After staff presented a summary of the proposed zoning ordinance amendments, BOCC members asked three <br />questions. <br />1. How can the County not exempt bona fide agricultural operations from the flood damage prevention <br />regulations when they are part of the Zoning Ordinance? <br />2. How will the non-conformity issue affect existing structures in the floodplain? <br />3. Would a clearer notice wording have been possible? <br />Several citizens from the Lake Orange neighborhood spoke. Their concerns are summarized as follows: <br />• Moving the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance into the Zoning Ordinance would not be in the <br />property owners hest interest. <br />• A task force of interested parties should be appointed for the purpose of resolving several long- <br />standing issues that could include docks on the lake, stream buffers and floodplains. <br />• The County should honor the contractual rights of owners on Lake Orange. <br />• Proposed text amendments were not available to the public. <br />• Concern over the accuracy of base flood elevations supporting the floodplain contours. <br />Other citizen comments included: <br />• Concern that the 2007 revised map included almost half of the property owner's six acre parcel. <br />• Problems with a culvert because upstream drainage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.