Browse
Search
NS Contract - Strategic Growth Rural Conservation Consultant Implementation Update Amendment
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2000's
>
2007
>
NS Contract - Strategic Growth Rural Conservation Consultant Implementation Update Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 12:35:19 PM
Creation date
4/15/2009 4:57:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/11/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Contract
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STRATEGIC GROWTH AND RURAL CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br />Draff (10.1.20071 <br />• Chapter 3. SGRC Performance: Measuring Success This.chapter <br />describes how <br />Orange County will <br />3.1 The Reason for Measuring Performance measure the <br />We really don't know how much transfer credits are selling for, ongoing <br />or how many have been created or applied in strategic performance and <br />rowth areas. outputs of the SGRC <br />9 Program, and then <br />During one of the peer conservation program interviews, this was describes ways of <br />one of the responses we received. Not surprisingly, the South increasing or <br />('nrnlinn community that operated this particular development restraining the <br />eme~-nt of-Sr~RC <br />credit program did not advertise it or view it as a success: Other activity. <br />communities did not aggressively report. the performance of their <br />programs. <br />Even though transfer credits have to be applied as deed restrictions (or, sometimes, <br />covenants) and most transfer credit transactions can only occur as part of at least an <br />administrative review process, it is possible that this statement can be true. Over time, as <br />the SGRC program matures and the Orange County staff and elected /appointed <br />officials that helped to create the program change, the potential for losing track of the <br />SGRC program is great. Initially, the project team anticipates very few transactions, <br />which may also create a tendency to stop recording information about the credit <br />transactions that do occur. Measuring the performance of the SGRC Program allows <br />• Orange County staff, officials, and citizens to determine if the Program is living up to <br />their expectations, how to change the Program, and further promote it to reach <br />potential participants. <br />3.2 Initial Benchmarks <br />Books have been written; companies started and thrived; many lecture courses have <br />been taught, and magazines and software programs launched to address <br />performance measurement. Entering into a detailed discussion is not relevant, nor <br />should the task of measuring performance be difficult or onerous for Orange County. <br />Measuring performance simply requires four things to be successful: <br />^ Data, in a format and quantity that is suitable to the task; <br />^ Relationships, between the performance measurement(s) and the goals /objectives <br />of the program; <br />^ Analysts, that are capable and have the time to prepare and report information to <br />decision-makers; and <br />^ Reaction, from decision-makers to modify the program that is being measured. <br />A SGRC scorecard has been created that describes a number of performance <br />benchmarks that Orange County Planning and Zoning staff will complete as transfer <br />credits are created and applied. Since the project team anticipates that, like almost all <br />similar programs, the SGRC Program will begin slowly, the first two years will include a <br />benchmark to measure how many contacts are made with property owners and <br />developers inquiring about the Program. The SGRC scorecard is shown in Figure 3-1. <br />• <br />Orange County, North Cazolina <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.