Browse
Search
NS Contract - Strategic Growth Rural Conservation Consultant Implementation Update Amendment
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2000's
>
2007
>
NS Contract - Strategic Growth Rural Conservation Consultant Implementation Update Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 12:35:19 PM
Creation date
4/15/2009 4:57:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/11/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Contract
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STRATEGIC GROWTH AND RURAL CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br />Draff (10.1.2007) <br />• Table 2-7. Residential Planning Flow Process (Continued) <br />• <br />C, <br /> <br />-. - - <br />6. Initiate the Application Submittal <br /> p. Pay Application Fee(s) <br /> q. Internal Staff Review <br /> i. Approve <br /> li. Disa rove with Comments <br />7. Concept Plan Development In the concept plan for projects <br /> On-Site Visit with O.C. Staff <br />r proposing to use SGRC, it would be <br /> . <br />Sketch Plan (conventional or flexible) <br />s wise to have a qualitative notation <br /> . identi in an resources, utilities, <br /> t. o ayou s no necess roadways, or school capacities <br /> u. Location of Notable Features that would be negatively affected <br /> v. Negotiate with Rural Conservation Area Participant(s) should the SGRC option be <br /> ursued. <br />8. Neighborhood Informational Meeting During this meeting, there is an <br /> w. Mailings (Address List from Developers) Sent to opportunity to explain both the <br /> People within 500' Buffer Around Project CUP and SGRC process /program <br /> x. Drop-In Style Meeting Format and how they benefit Orange <br /> Covn <br />9. Concept Plan Review Note that no conditional use <br /> y. O.C. Staff Only requirement will be LESS restrictive <br /> Same Review Group as Preliminary Plan Review <br />z than any overlay district <br /> . <br />aa. Offer Comments to Developer requirement already in place. <br />A CUP essentialy requires a <br /> bb. Note CUP Conditions for Approval rezoning to a Conditional Use <br /> District. <br />10. Planning Board Review of Concept Plan me CuP process would allow <br /> cc. Staff/ Developer Presentations public boards to attach additional <br /> Public Comments <br />dd conditions on approval, especially <br /> . <br />ee. Review Concept Plan design and mitigation measures to <br />offset negative impacts due to <br /> i. Approve more intensive uses. <br /> ii. Disapprove (One-Year Moratorium) <br /> iii. Disa rove with Corrective Actions <br />11. Preliminary Plat Development The SGRC property valuation <br /> ff. Roads /Driveway Permit assessment would be presented at <br /> gg. Erosion Control Review this time, should the Rural <br />Conservation Area landowner and <br /> hh. Environmental Health Review developermutually agree that one <br /> ii. Fire Su cession Plan <br />pp is necessary. At this time, the <br /> U. Solid Waste Review developer could pursue a <br /> kk. Lot Surveys Completed Development Agreement with the <br /> II. Binding Option Signed with R.C.A. landowner County as an alternative to the <br /> mm. Easement Language and R.C.A. Strategic fraditional approval process. <br /> Growth Area Shown on Ma <br />12. Preliminary Plat Review <br /> nn. O.C. Staff Only <br /> oo. Conduct R.C.A. Review (if inffial review older than <br /> two years) <br /> pp. Letter to Developer for Comment (if significant <br /> comments) <br /> . Review Si ned Bindin O tion A reement <br />Orange County, North Carolina <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.