Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT <br />2-g. The removal of an item from Consent and its <br />discussion later in the meeting (or its potential non- <br />discussion) could place it in anon-sequential order <br />or unaddressed status in the meeting minutes. This <br />may create .confusion in the long term for the public <br />and the historical record. At the Boazd's December <br />11, 2008 meeting, four items were removed from <br />Consent to be discussed after the Decision agenda. <br />Three of those four Consent items were discussed <br />after the Decision agenda and the discussion <br />appeazs in the minutes senazate from the first <br />portion of the minutes for the Consent A eg nda. The <br />fourth Consent item is noted in the minutes as <br />removed from Consent by the Boazd for discussion, <br />but there is not any subsequent discussion reflected <br />in the minutes since the Board did not further <br />address the item in the meeting .due to time <br />constraints. Discussion of all Consent items <br />together at one time (current. practice), rather than <br />separately as the proposal suggests, may serve better <br />for future review of the public record. <br />N <br />O <br />