Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 05-04-1999
>
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2009 3:37:04 PM
Creation date
3/27/2009 3:30:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990504
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
ORD-1999-003 Proposed Amendments to the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance 05041999
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 1990-1999\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 26 '99 04~31PM ITPID-IIG~OPG <br />P.3~4 <br />Development on this scale was neither discussed nor anticipated by the participants in the <br />facilitated meeting. The yardstick in residents' minds was Hogan Farm., which many people had <br />felt was itself far too big, as you may recall. <br />I recommended during the development of the zone, and still strongly recommend to <br />place an upper limit vn the size - i.e. the number of dwelling units - pemtitted in each VMU, in <br />the range of about 200 to 300 units. This would be roughly equivalent to the eventual size of <br />Hogan Farm. And I recommend limiting the number of VMUs to two, as anticipated by the <br />residents of both Carrboro and the Northern Transition Area who participated in the facilitated <br />meeting. <br />Office/Assembly Acreage <br />I also note that the amount of offiee/assembly district acreage allowed is 3 or 4 times <br />greater than the total acreage of downtown Caaboro. While this appeared in the original Small <br />Area Plan, it was voted on but not approved by the participants in the facilitated meeting. It was <br />later added back in unilaterally by the Carrboro Board of Aldermen. Also, one of the suggestions <br />from the facilitated meeting which was not acted upon (as noted by the County Planning Dept.} <br />was the suggestion to encourage use of available commercial space in Carrboro before building <br />out in the Northern Transition Area_ <br />For these reasons, I suggest allowing a much smaller amount of acreage to be potentially <br />rezoned to Office/Assembly. Even just five to ten acres would be equivalent to another <br />downtown Carrboro. Much more would inevitably result in the need to widen the roads and <br />would completely alter the character of the area, <br />Commissioners Role in Approviuag Develvpment <br />I believe that you, the Commissioners, need to keep control of the development process <br />through the conditional use permitting stage. You are the only elected officials who speak for <br />those of us who live in the Northern Transition Area, and the only ones who can be counted upon <br />to respond to our concerns. While they have been willing to let us speak, as a group the Carrboro <br />Board of Aldermen have never addressed our concerns. <br />I have heard recommendations made by Jef and other residents that emphasize how <br />important it is for you to review the development plans through the conditional use permitting <br />stage. I agree with and strongly endorse these recommendations. <br />Other issues <br />I note that that Carrboro Board of Aldermen has taken it upon itself to add in auto related <br />uses as an allowable commercial use in the VMU. I'm not sure I see the need for auto-related <br />uses in a village mixed-use neighborhood. Most people, I believe, buy gas near where they work <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.