Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 05-04-1999
>
Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2009 3:37:04 PM
Creation date
3/27/2009 3:30:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990504
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
ORD-1999-003 Proposed Amendments to the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance 05041999
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 1990-1999\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z~ <br />Orange County Planning Staff Comments ~ ••~ <br />. Plan Recommendations mot R~ In Proposed Ordinance Amendment <br />Most recommendations in the Faalitated Small Area Plan for Carrboro's <br />Northern Study Area are contained in Section 5 (Implementation). However, Section I <br />('The Small Area Planning Process) and Section 4 ('The Recommended Small Area Plan) <br />also contain recommendations, some of which are not reflected dsewhere. The purpose <br />of this paper is m identify for further discussion, plea recommendations that were not <br />carried forward in ordinance language. Following, on a section-by-section basis is a <br />listing of recommendations that did not carry forward in the-proposed ordinance <br />amendmerrts: . <br />PaT ' <br />•2. IlVIl'ROVED QUANTITYIQUALITY OF CONSERVATION LAND: Aim for a <br />higher percentage of conservation lands in the Study Area comprised of lands that <br />are not severely constrained by flooding, wetness or steepness. Accomplish this <br />by setting standards for conservation lands in addition to wetlands and steep <br />slopes, and by offering a range of densities with rise in relation to the percentage <br />of land which is to be conserved. ~ _ <br />3. ~ REQUIRE CONSERVATION LA1~ID TO INTERCONNECT: Establish clgsign <br />standards for the open space in new• subdivisions so they will eventually coalesce <br />to create as interconnected network of protected lands as greenway corridors. <br />Pa- <br />FloatuigZones -Residential <br />Neighborhood Mixed Use: Following discussion of the village Mixed Use <br />(VMU) district, a district identified as Neighborhood Mixed Use is discussed. <br />Apparernly it was envisioned as a step down between the larger VMiJ and smaller <br />OfficeJAssembly (OJA) district. •. <br />~e 49 `;,, <br />• Figuro-4-2 ~lustrates a design called "Community Mixed Use." Thete• is no <br />additional description of this although it seems to fit the descaiption of'VMU. <br />-$ • <br />Measure 1.4 Attract devdopers who have successfully baflt mixed use and <br />clustered devdopments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.