Agenda - 05-04-1999 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

23 MARCH 20, 1999 REPORT Orange County Planning Staff Comments CONSISTENCY Between the Facilitated SmaII Area for Carrboro'a Northern Study Area and Proposed Amendments to' the Carrboro Land IIse Ordinance Section 2.6C of the Joint Planning Agreement requures that (w)henever Chapel hill proposes to amend the tort of its Land Development Ordinance,'and whenever Carrborn proposes to amend the tart of its Land Use Orduemice, the respecti ve towns shall deliver a copy of flee frill text of the pr~vposed amendrneiet to Orange county not later than thirty (30) days before the date of the pub&c hearing on any such amendment The agreement further states that (u)nless Orange County files with the respective towns a writtae objection on or before the date of the public teeming on the Proposed ordnance amendrr~ent, then adoption of the amendment by the respective town shall autoneatically ef,~ed a corresponding amendment to the applicable ordnance adopted by reference by Orange County as provided in Sect:'on Z1 G Arty such objection shall be based on a won by Orange County that the proposed amendment is incoirsistent with the adopted Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. Proposed amendments to the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance (hereafter referred to as the NSA Ordinance) to implement the recommmdatioa of the Facilitated Small Area Play for Carrboro's Northern Study Area were received is the specified t~meframe. The .amendments consist of 29 revisions or additions to the existing ordinance comprising 35 pages; some revisions are contained in one sentmce whereas others are multiple pages in length, Additional attachments include vernacular architecon~al standards with photographs and illustrations. The approach to analyzing confon~ity of the 29 revisions with the adopted small area Plan at this stage is brief The title or content of each section is listed below with a brief assessment of its consistency or inconsistency with the adopted plan. The primary intent is to identify areas needing further investigation. . ~. Section 1. T Ste arhicle and section re,~iererrces core~ited in thfs o~rdirumce are to the Carrboro Irnu~,l7se Gam. Consistent '' Tnconsisteat _,_,Not Addressed ~ Not Applicable X Comments: Section 2. Residelaticl d'enslty of major' developments in certain districts Consistent X Inconsistent _____Not Addressed Not Applicable Comments: Formula for determining constrained leads needs to be same~in plan and ordinance.