Agenda - 06-01-1999 - 9a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

21 through tipping ~ee~. A revie~r of the replaceas~nt schedule shows that three major pieces of landfill equipment, together valued in excess of i million doSlars are being phased-out tCocnpactor, Doaer, sad Scraper/Pan). The rstaaining equipment are assigned to C&D disposal, mulch/yard waste, dust control, or White goods and scrip tiro atianageyaeat. The scraper/pan and dozer that are not being replaced will bt utilizQd to perfoz~a closure activities on the site for about a year after the site reaches capacity. 5. At what point was the interim C&D site oa Bubaaks Road abandoned in favor o! a large northern site? A CaD Taak Force was created bar the Landfill. Owners Group sad charged to identify a site, obtain art option ozt the property and, orue it ie deemed permittable by the state, to recomeaead to the three governing bodies that it be purchased b'Y the landfill Fund. The Task Force has identified a site in aorthezn Orange County . 2t has facilitated an option on the property- and is currently having the site evaluated for its riuitab3lity as a C&D disposal facility. In choosing to pursue this site, the Task Force determined that the larger rsorthera situ would provicue ample C34D capacity in a reasonable timeframe without the need for an interim site. There may be some juptificatioa for reconsidering this recoaerendation. Hy our estimation, d~iopcaent of Site #8 IGuesa Raad~ to open is the syriag of 1999, iaclucling additional •quipawnt and personnel would coat approximately $1.3eo.ooo for FY 1999/00. our estimate for developing au iateriaa sitQ on Eubanks eoad, Mith a life of about 21 years is $~jQ,~QQQ for FY 1999/00. This estimate assu~cres that Duke University Would assess either no or a very low gee for granting us buffer easement on their property. This estimate also aasum+es that the Ding groperty will be scqus.red by eminent domain. Aa additional 11 years of CS~D landfill capacity could bQ gained by acquiring Site 8 sad obtaining the necessary SUP, sad simultaneously acquiring and developing the SubaakS Road iaterittt site to receive waste beginning next year. The estimated cost of both developing th! interim site and acquiring Site 8 is S~2e_ooo. The advantage of pursuing the interioa site in conjunction with acquiring Site #8 is abtai~ting an additional ii years of capacity at a Iawer initial cost tS920,000 vs. ;1,3ov,00o) thaw only developing Sita #8. This optioA coaceptually~a~eaas that vn would be laadbanking Site #8. Another advantage is that hauler convenience Mould be maintained for another li years. 91e estimate that approximately 70 minutes would be added to the haul time for the users of the Ci~D facility. A third advantage ie that development costs for Site )F8 would be incurred 9-10 years irval now.