Orange County NC Website
4a-2 <br />~6 <br />~oe~,#s an ar~~ ~0~7 ~]~a~ uses ~ ~'ordar~ ~~~ervo~ ~'~ge ~ of S <br />9It ?12~~7 <br />~. general ~ arrbaro's population a~' newly I S,D~~ clt~ens occupies a uriicipal area <br />from which the ~ re~renue is ~ percent residential ar~d T ~ percent co~nercial, <br />Though the tov~n has made a can~it~nent ~o div~rsifyi~ its ~ base, a sig~r~x~eant <br />alteration of the and associated revenue generation wll to some time, and <br />could be severely limited by these rules. ghat happens Carrbaro finds that it <br />cannot achieve the required nutrient reductions through load reducing a.cti~rities <br />without banlarupt~ng the Town, either through budgeting that applies the hulls oftawn, <br />esaurces to ~'o~dan ~~les i~npln~en.tian ar the pay~ne~.t of fines due to its lack of <br />compliance? what will be acceptable tie frames for irnplem~enting the local plan, <br />and hew will ~lae state ensurelsuppoz~lwark with the Tav~n to yield the shared desired <br />outcome afwater quality enhancement without ~an.cial min? <br />4~. general - The ~Jpper dew Dope ~ of Jordan fake has demonstrated water quality <br />charactestics lower than these afthe ren~alnde~r afthe lai~e~ It ~ the town's opinion <br />that this difference is substantially due to the configuration of the lade, pa~lcularly <br />the causeway that suppo~s Farrington ~.oad and the canstrict~an of water flow that <br />occur between the Capper dew Dope Arm and the ~e~.ainder of the lade. The Tarn <br />is interested determining whethex.eithez~ of the following actions has been <br />considered as alterative rr~easuxes to ipxo~e water quality in the lake. <br />a, l~vdeling removal ~~ the causeway and its zeplacement with a structure <br />that would reduce the constriction an flaw. while it is understood that the <br />. enhanced how that wo~zld occux under this option nay not can~pletely <br />restore chlorophyll A to deixed levels, it is postulated that the levels <br />would be closer to state standards, therefore decreasing the required <br />nitrogen and phosphorous reductions to achie~'able Ze~els. <br />b. ix~ce It acts similarly to a forebay ~ a structural best manageme~at <br />practice, reclassi~catian afthe C~'pper dew dope Arm ofthe lake and <br />rnadif cation of its permitted uses, andlnr revision. of the applicable <br />chlorophyll .~ standard sa that levels might not be as limiting, <br />. general -~ Cn order for the application of the nutr€ent management requixenaents far <br />Gordan l~a~c to be fair and accurate, modeling of atrnaspheric nitrogen associated <br />with existing land uses aa~d vehicle miles traveled, water quality degradation, and the <br />necessa.~y' nutrient managerent strategies must be part ofthe rule when it is adapted. <br />Funds need to be budgeted far these~activzties immediately, lfthxs has not yet <br />occurred. The passibility of expending extensive ~esaurces ~- tie and n~ane~ ~- on <br />nutrient n~ar~agernent that does eat account far the atmospheric cantr~but~an of <br />nitrogen is wasteful and costly. <br />~. general ~ Are the nitrogen and phosphorous laad~ng rate targets technically feasible <br />in association wx~ dense development activities`? arrbo~o of~cials~have expressed <br />grave concerns that loading rate targets may present such an insurmountable abstacle <br />so as to render areas afthe Town's jurisdiction unde~relopable. The Tawn# existing <br />starrnater regulations have been zdent~ed a discauxagixxg de~'eloprnent and <br />redevelopment. A.dditianal ~egulatian run the risk of further discau~aging <br />rede~relcpment and ar~y associated water quality improvements that would be <br />achieved through such redeveXopr~r~ent's compliance with existing Town regulations, <br />or future versions which ga further tawa~d addressing ,Ca~rdan's nutrient issues. <br />~~~ ~le~t l~ai~ ~t~~e~, ~arrbaro, N~ ~7~~ ~ <br />A~! AQUA[. ~PP~RTUNITY L~NCP~.{~Y~R <br />