Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-15-1999 - III
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 06-15-1999
>
Agenda - 06-15-1999 - III
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 9:17:19 AM
Creation date
3/24/2009 3:59:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/15/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
III
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990615
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />JUN-07-1999 03:55 FROM ORANGE COUNTY FINANCE TO 9 933 5095 P,03 <br />Table 2A. Explanation of Alternatives for Possible County Cuts <br />' <br />From 2.7 cents to I cent <br />Item <br />Dollar <br />Level <br />% of <br />Thinking Behind Cut <br />Amount <br />Currently <br />Current <br />of Cut <br />Funded <br />Funded <br />Represented- <br />in Cut <br />1. Impact Fee, <br />$120,606 <br />Not <br />N/A <br />It is very likely that this- affordable <br />reimbursement for <br />currently <br />housing project will not -be completed <br />First B aptist <br />funded <br />before June 30, 20W. If the project is <br />Churcli'. <br />completed prior to then, and the Board <br />wisbes to reimburse First Baptist <br />Church, an appropriation could be <br />made ftom fund balance. <br />2. Studenf.-Generation <br />$46,000 <br />�4ot <br />N/A <br />There are at least three alternatives to <br />and impact Fee <br />cumntly <br />outsourcing these reports: <br />Reports - <br />funded <br />Triangle -Apartment Association <br />has offered to pay to have these <br />studies completed; <br />Studies could be postponed for one* <br />Planning staff could perform <br />studies in-house using current <br />staff <br />3. Rpard ofCoUnty <br />$100,000 <br />$250,000 <br />40% <br />If there were items that the Boaid <br />Commissioners' <br />wanted ' to address and f and M the <br />'Board couldhi�ke'an appropriation <br />from. fund -balance. <br />4;. Reduce Incmas6m' <br />$7,128 <br />$893,565 <br />.8 �/o <br />As recominend6d by the, Cotmty <br />Outsi& Age*y <br />Manager; the, overall increase. in <br />Appropr�afions'by <br />outside agency funding is about 2.5%. <br />25% <br />This potential cut, coincides -with other <br />possible cuts in County and m�inicipal <br />6. Redaw-increase in <br />$1,580 <br />$322,060 <br />.49%. <br />As recommended by the County . - <br />Municipal Support <br />Manager, the overall increase in <br />Appropriations tyy. <br />municipal -support funding is - <br />10% <br />approximately 5%. This potential cut <br />coincides with other. possible cuts -in <br />County. operations -a�d outside agency. <br />S. Re - duce cGntribution <br />Not <br />N/A <br />Early in the spring, the Red Cross <br />to Red Cross A�apital <br />Currently, <br />requested financial assistance with <br />Campaiga by -50% <br />funded <br />their purchase of a, new facility. This <br />agency has not received funds from the <br />2unt�� in the past. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.