Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-15-1999 - I
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 06-15-1999
>
Agenda - 06-15-1999 - I
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 9:14:28 AM
Creation date
3/24/2009 3:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/15/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
I
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990615
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Robert M. Jessup Jr. <br />Memorandum <br />To: Landfill reorganization working group <br />Date: June 7, 1999 <br />Regarding: Comments received on June I draft agreement <br />I have received a few continents on the June I draft agreement that I thought I would <br />share with the group. <br />I . I have been asked whether the 60 acres of the Greene Tract to be transferred to <br />the County comes out of the County's ownership portion of the entire Greene Tract, or <br />whether the County remains a 43% owner of the remainder. Certainly the current draft does <br />not address this point explicitly. I believe that the better reading of the current text, as well <br />as my understanding from our earlier meeting, was that the County would become the sole <br />owner of the 60 acres and remain a 43% owner of the remainder. I would propose that the <br />agreement should be clarified on this point, however. <br />2. I have. been asked whether the second sentence of the second paragraph of Part <br />5 (on the Greene Tract) could be amended to read that "the County may use the property <br />described on Exhibit E for System purposes only" (thereby adding the word "only" at the <br />end of the sentence). That change seems to me to be consistent with the group's agreement, <br />but I need to hear that the County accepts that change. <br />3. it has been suggested to me that the references to the University in Part 7 <br />should be references to UNC -CH, and the references to the President to the Chancellor. <br />That may well be what's intended. But I would assume we would want to pick up UNC <br />Hospitals as well, wouldn't we? I would appreciate anyone else's thoughts. <br />4. It has been suggested that the reference to the "solid waste plan" (in the <br />definition of "Solid Waste Management Plan and Policies," near the bottom of page 13 of <br />the clean copy) should contain an explicit reference to the one -page "plan framework" (of <br />which I have attached a copy). That makes sense to me, if in fact that's the document that's <br />previously been approved by the boards. I would point out, however, that the County is free <br />to change any aspect of the plan or the framework without the consent of any other party. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.