Orange County NC Website
Robert M. Jessup Jr. <br />Memorandum <br />To: Landfill reorganization working group <br />Date: June 7, 1999 <br />Regarding: Comments received on June I draft agreement <br />I have received a few continents on the June I draft agreement that I thought I would <br />share with the group. <br />I . I have been asked whether the 60 acres of the Greene Tract to be transferred to <br />the County comes out of the County's ownership portion of the entire Greene Tract, or <br />whether the County remains a 43% owner of the remainder. Certainly the current draft does <br />not address this point explicitly. I believe that the better reading of the current text, as well <br />as my understanding from our earlier meeting, was that the County would become the sole <br />owner of the 60 acres and remain a 43% owner of the remainder. I would propose that the <br />agreement should be clarified on this point, however. <br />2. I have. been asked whether the second sentence of the second paragraph of Part <br />5 (on the Greene Tract) could be amended to read that "the County may use the property <br />described on Exhibit E for System purposes only" (thereby adding the word "only" at the <br />end of the sentence). That change seems to me to be consistent with the group's agreement, <br />but I need to hear that the County accepts that change. <br />3. it has been suggested to me that the references to the University in Part 7 <br />should be references to UNC -CH, and the references to the President to the Chancellor. <br />That may well be what's intended. But I would assume we would want to pick up UNC <br />Hospitals as well, wouldn't we? I would appreciate anyone else's thoughts. <br />4. It has been suggested that the reference to the "solid waste plan" (in the <br />definition of "Solid Waste Management Plan and Policies," near the bottom of page 13 of <br />the clean copy) should contain an explicit reference to the one -page "plan framework" (of <br />which I have attached a copy). That makes sense to me, if in fact that's the document that's <br />previously been approved by the boards. I would point out, however, that the County is free <br />to change any aspect of the plan or the framework without the consent of any other party. <br />