Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-21-1999 - 10d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 06-21-1999
>
Agenda - 06-21-1999 - 10d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 10:35:47 AM
Creation date
3/20/2009 3:50:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/21/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990621
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the use of an impact fee for public uses including recreation, but this proviso has <br />not been utilized to date. <br />As of 1999, Carrboro has collected $453,000 through its payment -in -lieu <br />program. Orange County currently has $488,000 available, allocated by four <br />districts in which the money must be spent. The County has also received land <br />dedications totaling 44 acres since 1986, although this land is in small pieces <br />exclusively in Bingham and Chapel Hill Townships. <br />The Work Group found that difficulties exist with the existing payment -in -lieu <br />programs. The funds must be geographically earmarked and spent within the <br />area collected. They must also be supplemented with matching funds for use. <br />Considerable research was performed to explore programs in other jurisdictions, <br />and a special meeting with Richard Ducker from the Institute of Government was <br />held to review payment -in -lieu possibilities. <br />6. Recommendations <br />Using the research and deliberations of 17 months, and with the charge and <br />goals of the project in mind, the Work Group developed nine recommendations, <br />summarized as follows (these recommendations also appear on pages 34 -40). <br />A. Create a Parks and Resource Lands Council <br />As we move to coordinate long -term recreation and parks planning, the need for <br />a permanent joint council (to meet quarterly) was identified, building on the <br />useful nature of the Work Group itself. Possible duties might include: <br />➢ Develop and review standards <br />➢ Develop future parks bond proposals <br />Provide a coordinating mechanism for parks plan updates <br />➢ Make recommendations on allocations of future bond moneys <br />Coordinate acquisitions though the County Land Resource Acquisition <br />Program <br />A resolution asking the local boards to create the Parks and Resource Lands <br />Council is attached as Appendix L. <br />B. Inter jurisdictional Standards <br />As previously noted, impediments exist to the creation of common standards that <br />could be used Countywide for recreation and parks facilities. If coordinated <br />funding were pursued, the need for some coordinated standard would be <br />important. The Parks and Resource Lands Council is recommended as a <br />mechanism to accomplish this goal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.