Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-21-1999 - 10d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 06-21-1999
>
Agenda - 06-21-1999 - 10d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 10:35:47 AM
Creation date
3/20/2009 3:50:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/21/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990621
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br />5/26/99 <br />focus for future parks and recreation development could be <br />targeted to smaller,"less- intensive neighborhood parks and larger <br />district parks. <br />• By combining active and low- impact recreation needs at the district <br />park level (100 -plus acres), it may be possible to develop trails and <br />retain natural areas on the perimeter while dedicating the interior <br />to active facilities and "hidden" parking areas. Care must be <br />exercised to ensure the integrity of natural areas, however. <br />• Buffers should contain enough land and mature tree canopy to <br />minimize sound and lighting to an acceptable level. <br />• Place future programmed active recreation facilities in larger district <br />parks and make neighborhood parks low- impact. <br />• Look countywide to define future neighborhood and district parks - <br />working with UNC, OWASA and other entities. <br />• Related to the above, land acquisition for parks is needed now to <br />begin to identify and save priority parklands. Several local <br />governments (including some city /county joint efforts) are <br />presently engaged in this (sometimes called land banking). <br />D. Mechanisms for Implementing Goals Through <br />Capital Improvement Plans (CIP's) and Long- <br />term Parkland Acquisition <br />To be developed. A meeting of the Managers, elected representatives and <br />staffs is being scheduled to address these issues. <br />E. Coordination Opportunities with UNC / <br />Implications of UNC Expansion <br />The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provides both facilities that are <br />used by the greater town and County populations, and users of local <br />recreational facilities in the form of students who live on and (particularly) <br />off- campus. <br />Currently, UNC provides the following recreational facilities for its students. <br />Policy does not allow use by non - students, although this policy is not strictly <br />enforced and many Town residents avail themselves of facilities like the <br />Botanical Gardens, Finley Golf Course, Kenan Stadium, Fetzer Field /Belk <br />Track, and groups like Rainbow Soccer use fields owned by the University. <br />In the 1996 report "Recreation and Park Issues in Orange County ", the work <br />group "determined that in applying standards to the population of Orange <br />County that 11,000 people (students living in dormitories and <br />fraternities /sororities) could be subtracted from population totals in deriving <br />park acreage needs. The assumption underlying this adjustment is that these <br />students reside on campus and have their recreation needs met wholly by <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.