Agenda - 06-21-1999 - 8v - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

5 ,, _ , .~ ~,,~ .. x. F ~[?! xr; •• ~xt ,~ ,., r ~..;:tt. +;,fr,.`•v ..,SSw,r::•9$:+,.' .~i6f '.w^•r.'::hi2.t,,'fta:a::~w3.tic:~:J.Sta:rr~4:.::v:::ti,:h:.dn.!•.,vrt•:.t;::.'•r::wCrt•...•....:: ::;..'•::::::::'v:`•t The federal and state guidelines for the Certified Local Government Program require that the CLGs participate in the process of nominating properties to the National Register of Historic Places. This participation involves the review of nominations within the jurisdiction of the CLG by the CLG Commission and the chief elected local official. Opportunity for public comment must be provided during the 60-day comment period. The commission and the chief elected official are required to submit comments to the State Historic Preservation Office and the owner of the property relaying their findings as to the eligibility of the property under consideration for listing in the National Register. The attached forms are provided for you to facilitate your review of nominations and your submittal of comments to the State Historic Preservation Office. A copy of the criteria for listing in the National Register is also enclosed for your reference and use. Although the federal regulations governing the CLG program call for the chief elected local official to provide comments on proposed National Register nominations within the CLG jurisdiction, North Carolina law stipulates that the mayor or chairman of the board of county commissioners may act only in an administrative capacity on behalf of the local governing board. If a certified local government has doubts about the legality of the chief elected official assuming sole responsibility for comments on proposed National Register nominations, it may wish to consider two alternatives: 1) having the governing board review the nominations or 2) having the governing board pass a resolution granting the chief elected local official the authority to furnish comments on behalf of the governing board.