Minutes - 19740107 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~ The County Zoning Officer stated that there were two re-zoning requests and • that each of these requests had been denied by the County Planning Board. They were: 1. Request of Hubert F, Browning to rezone tract iri Eno Township from residential to rural commercial. Discussion ensued. Upon motion of Commissioner Flora Garrett, seconded by Commissioner Richard E, Whitted, it was moved that the recommendation of the County Planning Svard be approved. Chairman Walker called for a veto on the motion. Commissioners Flora Garrett, Richard E, Whitted and Melvin Whitfield voted aye. Cpmmiasioner9 Henry S, Walker and Norman Walker voted nay. Chairman Walker dealassd the motion passed. 2. Reaueat of Curtis Sane to rezone a tract in Eno Township from residential to rural commercial. Discussion ensued, Upon motion of Commissioner Richard E, Whitted, seconded by Commissioner Flora Garrett, it was moved, that the Board accept the recommendation of the County Planning Soard. Chairman Walker. called for a note on the motion. Commissioners Flora Garrett, Henry S. Walker, Richard E, Whined and Melvin Whitfield voted aye. Chairman Norman Walker voted nay, Chairman Walker then declared the motion passed, The County Attorney presented the following Resolution relative to the recorded plat of Robinswood Section 2: "WHEREAS Trent Development Corporation subdivided Robinswood, Section II and did record a plat thereof in Plat Book 22 at Page 3; and WHEREAS it has been discovered that said plat contains Iota which do not meet the requirements of the Zoning and 3ubdivi,sion Ordinances of Orange County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County Administrator request Trent Development Corporation to execute a document which will reflect the erroneous approval of said plat by both the County Planning Board and the Board of County Commissioners, and that lots 6, 7, 21, 30, 38, l16, 49, 61+, 57 and 71 and possibly others, as shown on said plat do not meet the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, and that zoning or building permits will not b® issued for late which do not meet said requirementa~ the County Administrator shall also request the owner to further authorize a notation to be placed on the aforesaid plat which will refer to the book and page where said documentation is recorded," Upon motion of Commissioner Melvin Whitfield, seconded by Commissioner Richard E. Whitted, it was moved that Drange County adapt the foregoing Resolution. The Chairman referred the Board to Ttem 16 of the Agenda: (Will the County Elect To Impose A Pet Tax For the Fiscal Year 19711-1975? This is a continuation of a diacuasion started at the December 18th meeting.) The County Administrator advised the Board that they must decide whether or not to levy a Pet Tax for the fiscal year 197!1-1975. Chairman Walker stated that for the purpose of diacuasion he would recommend that the Board not levy a Pet Tax, It was agreed that before any tax could be levied that the Board must define what animals would be considered as pets. It was agreed that the Board would adopt a Resolution that would define pets as dogs and that the Pet Tax would be levied against doge. The County Attorney was instructed to draft a Resolution on the matter and present same at the February llth meeting. There being no further business to come before the Board the meeting was ad~vurned, C, Norman Walker, Chairman Betty June Hayes, Clerk