Orange County NC Website
11 <br />Orange Water and Sewer Authority <br />Jordan Lake Comments to NC Environmental Management Commission <br />July 10, 2007 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />more than 1,500 acres of land acquired by OWASA in fee simple ownership or permanent <br />conservation easements, few, if any, additional management options exist for further reducing <br />nutrient inputs to these reservoirs. With no State or Federal regulatory mandate, we have <br />essentially established total maximum daily loads (TMDLs} for both lakes and implemented the <br />most appropriate nutrient management strategies; yet both lakes continue to exhibit periodically <br />high chlorophyll g concentrations and cyanobacteria episodes. Are these water bodies <br />"impaired?" We don't believe they are; but we do believe that North Carolina's nutrient criteria <br />and related water quality standards are in urgent need of substantial revision. DWQ's EPA- <br />approved Nutrient Criteria Implementation Plan deserves the Commission's full support. <br />Need for a Jordan Lake Use Attainability Analysis <br />What if the Nutrient Strategy and proposed Rules are adopted, but they don't work? <br />Proposed Rules .0265 and .0266 require all local governments in the Jordan Lake watershed to <br />develop stormwater management programs that will achieve and sustain reduced nutrient loads <br />from new and existine development. If the feasibility studies required under the Rules <br />determine that nutrient reduction tazgets for new and existing development aze not attainable <br />due to technical, economic, or administrative constraints, then the Jordan Lake TMDL will not <br />be met and the strate¢v will be deemed a failure. Given the likelihood that this will be the <br />outcome of most, if not all, of the local feasibility studies, we urge the Commission and DWQ <br />to proceed immediately with a Jordan Lake Use Attainability Analysis, as authorized by the <br />Clean Water Act for situations where TMDLs cannot be achieved. l:n the meantime, we urge <br />the Commission to adopt a rational, realistic, and phased approach to implementing the nutrient <br />reduction requirements. <br />Point Source Nutrient Reduction <br />OWASA's Mason Farm Wastewater Treatment Plant has been meeting total phosphorus <br />removal requirements for nearly 20 years. In 2002 we decided to construct multi-million dollar <br />deep bed filters that could remove total nitrogen to the current limits of technology as part of our <br />next facility upgrade -even though OWASA was under no requirement to do so. Those <br />improvements have been completed, and our treatment plant can now remove total nitrogen to <br />the proposed target levels - at least until the plant reaches its new capacity of 14.5 million <br />gallons per day. Additional energy and chemicals needed to achieve the proposed 2016 mass <br />load limit for TN will cost more than $500,000 per year at our current wastewater flow rates, <br />and well over $1 million per year in today's dollars when the plant reaches full capacity in the <br />next 15 to 20 years. Without significant advances in TN removal technology, OWASA will not <br />be able to achieve the proposed annual mass load limit when average day wastewater flows <br />exceed 14.5 million gallons per day, and we may need to restrict additional connections to our <br />wastewater system at that time. <br />