Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-17-1999 - 9g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 08-17-1999
>
Agenda - 08-17-1999 - 9g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2009 3:59:43 PM
Creation date
3/13/2009 3:59:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/17/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9g
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990817
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Mr. Roscoe E. Reeve <br />Page 4 <br />July 21, 1999 <br />enlarging of tax districts and city units. I have reviewed the <br />procedure for making a change in the presently recognized <br />boundary between the two school districts with the attorneys <br />for both school districts. Both concur with my assessment that <br />any change in the location of the boundary now will be a G.S. <br />115C-73 tax district and city administrative unit enlargement <br />procedure. I have enclosed a copy of that statute with this <br />letter. I recommend to those interested in this boundary that <br />this statute be used as a method for resolving the question of <br />the boundary between the two school districts. If a <br />determination is made by the Orange County School Board and the <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Board to relocate the boundary to <br />where it was apparently intended to be located in 1951, I <br />recommend that, if at all possible, the boundary be relocated <br />over its entire length, that is, from the Orange-Durham County <br />boundary line due west to its intersection with the University <br />Railroad tracks. This, of course, may require the owners of all <br />affected property to become involved in the process for change. <br />g If you have any questions about any of this, please advise. <br />Very truly yours, <br />COLEMAN GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE, P.C. <br />GEG/lsg / <br />Enclosures <br />xc: Tom Heffner <br />John M. Link, Jr. <br />John McCormick, Esquire <br />D. Michael Parker, Esquire <br />Rod Visser <br />mydocuments/reeve#3.ltr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.