Browse
Search
Minutes - 19731016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1973
>
Minutes - 19731016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:01:05 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:10:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/16/1973
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. _ _....k. .. <br />-~~ <br />Tn regard to future funding of the administrative needs of the Triangle <br />.Corporation Mr. Herndon stated they had filed application for funding with <br />both the Babcock and Reynolds Foundations. It would not be until early in 1974 <br />before they receive an answer from these requests for funds. To finance their <br />program until January 1, 1971}, the Corporation needs about $7,600. Tf they are <br />not funded through their present or some other grant requests they might file <br />the group will have to come back to the County in 1971} for additions], funds. <br />Durham, Wake and 3ohnson Co+uities have already made funding committments to <br />them. Lee County has made an informal committment and Chatham County has <br />promised an answer in early November. Mr, Herndon stated plans for development <br />Dell for housing units (apartments) of 600 square feet in size that will be <br />built in some sort of cluster arrangement and cyst about $15,OD0 per square <br />foot. Utilities and site improvements would cost another $5.00 per square foot. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Flora Garrett, aecnnded by Commissioner Richard <br />E, Whitted, it was moved and unanimously adopted, that $1,000 be granted from the <br />Contigency Fund to the Triangle Housing Development Corporation. <br />The County Administrator made a brief report of the situation as it has <br />developed concerning the Graham application for Orange County funds under the <br />Clean Water Sond Act. No further action on this request is expected until a <br />meeting scheduled in mid November. <br />Chairman Norman Walker then stated the Board of Commissioners would again <br />discuss the proposed rho valley Agreement. <br />Commissioner Flora Garrett briefly reviewed the comments she had filed <br />with the County Administrator. Her comments are as follows: <br />2. Pa a 2: 2nd Para ra h; This paragraph is misleading and at least <br />was not pu 1 cly acknowledged to be the case. The first sentence <br />is either very bad grammar or untrue. Durham has not obtained water <br />from the Eno for fifty years and until very recently has owned only <br />a small portion of hand on the Eno. Again, Durham has not publicly <br />declared its intentions for a reservoir. <br />22. Page 6: Line 10: Add "County" this section should mention more <br />specifically Orange County's interest. <br />IIT, Paae 8: The Agreement: <br />Paragraph 2: "Has the City of Durham in reality acquired all lands <br />except two parcels between Cole I~fill Road and the Orange County line?" <br />Para rash This paragraph must be explicit enough to indicate <br />Orange ounty is a party or can become a party to land acquisition, <br />A case in point: Cabes Ford in Orange County is rapidly becoming <br />a littered, often dangerous place on the Eno River. White it is a <br />popular and lovely plats to en5oy the river, someone should step in <br />fairly quickly to police and clean up the area. Orange County should <br />have that option. <br />Paragraph 1~: In line four change the word "potential" to "possible". <br />Para ra hs & 6: These paragraphs are really not necessary. <br />Paragraph 7: Add at its conolusion-"---------and failing in this <br />respeot will look to all other possible sources of water supply <br />before turning to the Eho. <br />Paragraph 8: Rewrite this paragraph: That if all possibilities " <br />fail end the Fhv is needed for a water supply by the City of Durham, <br />then the State and Orange County intend to cooperate with the City <br />of Durham in the planning and developing of such water supply. <br />Orange County, as stated earlier, is in favor of a State Park on the <br />~.v and would like to aid in any way possible. However if we sign the <br />agreement as it is written, the signature in effeot means that we agree <br />with what has been stated. Indeed as pointed out earlier in the notes <br />there are some very misleading statements and some glaring omissions. <br />Orange County should be very much a part .of this agreement. We certainly <br />want some input in planning for a.major recreational park in our County and <br />we should have input as to acquisition of land. This agreement is not a <br />two party agreement. <br />__ If the agreement takes some time for s11 parties to sign, then Orange <br />County is interested in. working with the State independently and <br />immediately for two ma3vr purposes; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.