Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-23-1999 - D4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 08-23-1999
>
Agenda - 08-23-1999 - D4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2009 12:26:52 PM
Creation date
3/12/2009 12:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/23/1999
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
d4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990823
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ <~ <br />Orange Water and Scwcr Authority <br />February 11, 1999 <br />Page IS <br />William Strom said i~c does not understand why the Town of Hillsborough is no[ required to get <br />approvals tivhen OWASA is required to get approvals. Mr. Strom said the agreement is important <br />eciough to move toward signing it and hope that the Town oC Hillsborough can be convinced to join. <br />Peter Gordon said it does not make sense for OWASA to sign the agreement iC the Town of <br />Hillsborough does not sign it. Dr. Gordon said exactly the same provisions should not apply to both <br />OWASA and the Town oC Hillsborough. OWASA's long-term interest area should be recognized by <br />the Towa of Hillsborough and, if not, Peter Gordon said he wonders about the value of the <br />agreement. <br />Bernadette Pelissier asked if the Town of Hillsborough definitively said they would not sign <br />the agreement and Ms. Pelissier also asked what their objections are. Yt is probably related to the <br />Cact that the-Town of Hillsborough does not have a joint planning agreement and that the Town o[ <br />Carrboro, Town of Chapel Hitl, and Orange County do have joint planning agreements. l:f OWASA <br />does not sign the agreement, it will not help the larger issue of the Town o[ Hillsborough's lack of <br />participation. <br />Patrick Davis said if the Town of Hillsborough is not a party to the agreement, there is a <br />significant hole that relates to the integrity o[ the rural buffer concept that could present a problem <br />in terms o[ the joint planning agreement. Mr. Davis said it is his opinion that iC the Town of <br />Hillsborough decides not to participate in the agreement then that is sufficient reason for OWASA <br />not to participate in an agreement of this nature that is designed to formalize OWASA's retail <br />service extension policies relative to the land use planning efforts of joint planning parties. Patrick <br />Davis said the Town oC Hillsborough's interest is to have a common boundary line established which <br />they reviewed some time ago. The agreement has expanded at this point and the Town of <br />Hillsborough has not expressed much interest. Mr. Davis said stafT oC the Town oC Hillsborough said <br />they would be inclined to recommend that the Town of Hillsborough not sign the agreement the way <br />it has been structured. The Town oC Hillsborough's specific concerns have not been formalized in <br />writing. Patrick Davis said there is strong benefit for OWASA to formalize ifs commitment to be <br />cooperative with the local governments in its service area. <br />Alan Rimer said his concern is that a neighboring community may choose to extend services <br />into an area that the group believes should not be served. There is precedent for that in the past. <br />Mr. Rimer said he is concerned that the Town oC Hillsborough is not at the table and they may have <br />designs on the rata[ bullet where OWASA cannot extend service. Mr. Rimer said he would like <br />assurances that will not happen and the agreement should be tailored accordingly. OWASA should <br />strive to find a way .to work toFVards a consensus and make it an agreement that the Town of <br />Hillsborough will sign. Alan Rimer said it is critical that the Town of Hillsborough comes back to the <br />table in order for it to be a working agreement. <br />William Strom said OWASA can only be responsible Cor its own actions and there are <br />significant benefits for OWASA to sign the agreement. Mr. Strom said it behooves OWASA to <br />support the rural buffer, to support the agreement, and to support OWASA's constituent <br />governments by indicating willingness to sign the agreement. <br />Susannah Holloway asked if the agreements could be bifurcated. For instance, art <br />agreement with tlic Town of Hillsborough regarding the boundary and an agreement [or alt the other <br />items. Patrick Davis said in previous years that he and Barry Jacobs proposed a phase Y service area <br />boundary agreement ~vitli the Town of fiil[sborough because tine Task Force had a commitment for <br />agreement on tl~e boundary line. The Task Force overruled it because the. majority oC the members <br />wanted to tackle ail the issues together. <br />~'1'illiam Strou- said the Ucccrnbcr 14, 1994 document Crom Moses Carey makes approval of <br />file boundaries cot~tingcnt upon tine subsequent agreements. Patrick Davis said that vas the Task <br />14- Z? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.