Orange County NC Website
~_~•~ <br />In the spring of 1971 our Association presented its formal opposition to <br />Alternate One at a Commissioners hearing in Orange County (public hearing). The <br />membership is reaffirming its opposition and pleads that the County Commissioners <br />oppose the Alternate One seleotion. <br />An Officer or Board l4ember will willingly accept an invitation to appear <br />before the Commissioners for presentation of detailed points upon which the <br />opposition is based. <br />Aa President of the Association which represents nearly 500 residents of <br />southeast Orange County, I urgently request that the Commissioners strongly consider <br />the preliminary petition and to note opposition to Alternate One of Interstate 40. <br />Harold Jernigan, Principal of Carolina F`rienda School, said the construction of <br />I-40 would create safety problems for the students who attended the school and that <br />the area around the school was used as a tesahing labatory, however, the safety <br />factor was a prime concern of the Trustees of the School. He stated that Mt. Sinai <br />Road would have to be widened and thus would encroach on 17uke Forest and that he did <br />not feel the road would be adequate to handle the overflow of traffic from the I-!}0 <br />route. Mr. Jernigan said the highway is intended to gat traffic through Orange <br />County, not into the County. He said that the Board of Trustees of the School had <br />noted unanimously to oppose Alternate 1 of I-40. <br />Robert Fankhauser and Dr. David McFadden, residents of the area, spoke in <br />opposition to the routing of an interstate through the area. <br />The Chairman then inquired if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of <br />the construction of Alternate I of I-40. <br />Fred S. Cates, Mayor of the Town of Hillsborough, stated that his Soard had <br />evaluated all the proposed routes and that they did strongly endorse the recommendation <br />of the highway experts. He said his Board had no re&son to change the position that <br />they had previously taken in endorsing the aonatruation of Alternate I of I-!}0. <br />Oscar Compton, a resident of the Cedar Grove area, said he felt the construction <br />of I-40 was being objected to by environmentalist. He stated that I-i~0 would serve <br />as s farm to market road for the citizens who produce food and fiber for the State; <br />and that in order to produce the food and the fiber for the markets farmers were <br />forced to clear the land and cut the trees. Mr. Compton stated that farmers of <br />Person and Caswell counties, as well sa those of northern Orange County would be <br />benefited by the aonstruotion of I-4q as it would eliminate their having to drive <br />through the city of Raleigh in order to reach the market areas. <br />William C. Flay, former member of the Board of Commissioners, stated that the <br />construction of Alternate T oP I-40 would benefit the citizens of the northern area <br />of the county and that he could not see where it could damage the citizens of the <br />southern portion of the county. He stated that the proposed route would not only <br />be used by the farmers of his area, but that it would provide a more direct route for <br />the citizens who worked in Chapel Hill and at the Research Triangle Park. <br />Commissioner Flora Garrett stated that I would like to ask the Council of Govern- <br />ments to add to the impact statement a recommendation. Said recommendation would <br />read as follows: "One of the problems resulting from State and Federal highway and <br />Interstate planning is that many times local government officials feel that the <br />results of such planning are handed to them only for comment and review. Because <br />of a lack of direct invelvment around the conference table in road manning some <br />officials feel that they must shout to be heard and delays and conflicts arise. It is <br />strongly recommended that in reworking the draft environment impact statement that an <br />opportunity for working on the Interstate projects as a team be implemented between <br />local, State and Federal officials. <br />Commissioner Richard F,. Whitted stated that from the standpoint of environmental <br />impact, Alternate I is the worst possible route for I-40, as it would nut a 400 foot <br />wide strip through Orange County that is wider than any of the existing interstates. <br />This route for I-40 would overload I-85 between Hillsborough and Greensboro because <br />both routes will share the current highway. He stated that it was his understanding <br />that the proposed Alternate I would create more than one problem for Durham County <br />as it will take a proposed school site, affect a middle-income housing area and <br />oangest the Aurham EScpreasway. I feel that the State Highway Department needs to go <br />back to the drawing board and take another look, he stated. <br />Commissioner Henry Walker stated that after listening again to both sides of the <br />argument that he hadn't seen fit to change his mind from the decision that had been <br />reached by the Soard soma eighteen months prior. He said I don't think that anything <br />we decide will make any difference in where they will put I-40. <br />Commissioner Melvin Whitfield stated that he was not familiar enough with the <br />background information concerning I-40 but that he felt that from the discussion that <br />he had heard that the State Highway Commission should take another look at the project. <br />Chairman *Iorman Walker said he felt that the Board should take some action either <br />for Alternate I or against Alternate I. He said every delay is costly. <br />