Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-07-1999 - 10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 09-07-1999
>
Agenda - 09-07-1999 - 10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2009 2:42:28 PM
Creation date
3/11/2009 2:42:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/7/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10b
Document Relationships
1999 NS Water and Sewer Management Planning and Boundary Agreement 9-7-1999
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\1990's\1999
Minutes - 19990907
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Orange Water and Se`vcr Authority <br />February 11, t999 <br />Page 20 <br />William Strom said the notion aL OWASA extending liars into an interest area to remedy an <br />adverse public health emergency has'signiGcant impact on potential for sprawl and potential for <br />making land developable that does not pcrc. Mr. -Strom said his understanding is that the sizing of <br />[roes is a tool .that attempts to restrict tap-ons and avoids unattended consequences of remedying a <br />health emergency. William Strom said he is comfortabic with the language in the agreement that the <br />lines should be sized to address that emergency iC that is passible. <br />i','atrick Davis said a concern was raised with the Piney Mountain Subdivision project. There <br />were engineering sizing. requirements and constraints at the. State of North Carolina level that <br />required the infrastructure to be sized for peaking factors that were mandated by the- State and <br />would impact this issue. Mr. Davis said the fvay to address it would. be to point out that it is sued to <br />serve only the intended use but in accordance With the sizing requirements determined by the State. <br />Patrick Davis said implications should be recognized iC the decision is made to limit capacity. <br />Mr. Davis said there is also a related issue that has to do with improvements and Imes that <br />have excess capacity. For example, the Rangewood Subdivision's Corte main had to be 4", the pump <br />station had to be a certain capacity, and tivhen that is done there is automatically excess capacity <br />because the pump station .is only pumping a certain number of hours during the day. The agreement <br />is structured so that if Orange County wanted to locate a school facility or a human resource center <br />and hook onto the force main to take advantage of the excess capacity, the agreement would prohibit . <br />that from occurring. An investment already made could not be used more cost-effectively to support <br />public facility development. Patrick Davis said there. ought to be the ability to use Lines and facilities <br />that serve public emergencies kn appropriate ways to support essential public facilities. ? <br />Alan Rimer said OWASA could probabky meet the volume and pressure considerations with <br />a 4" water Line to serve a community of houses with problems. Fre protection could be provkded if <br />the size is increased to 6". Mr. Rimer suggested that the beaefitr of fire protection be considered. <br />- Alan Rimer asked Robert Epting if it is possible to restrict who taps oa to water tines. That gets to <br />the point of increased facility needs for the public for fire protection but 'prohibktr houses from <br />connecting. <br />Robert Epting said the Chapel Hill Town Attorney and the Orange County Attorney have a <br />frkendty d'uagreemeat oa than point. Orange County by -its .ability. to require building permitr <br />controls tap-ons. Mc Epting said OWASA could get special authority in that regard if it needed it. <br />however, many developers could see that as a method for limiting development. Robert Epting said <br />iC tap-ons are restricted, how can the [fines be afforded Eo serve a few people Fvho are experiencing the <br />problem if the only way to tuu the (fines is by assessment. <br />Wi[kiam Strom said in response to sizing the Iiaes to accommodate- fire,. there is an "avoid <br />sprawl" mentality. It is in the preambles in Orange County's Comprehensive P[aa, Mr. Strom said <br />that if someone buys a house is the watershed where there is no fire service and the community has a <br />water emergency, he does. not feel an obligation to provide fire service along with rescuing them from <br />a water problem. Orange County can restrict building. permits and control zoning, there is turnover <br />on the various boards and different political will exists. It seems that utility growth takes on a life of <br />. its o~vn and iC capacity is there, it usually gets used over a period of time. <br />Patrick Davis sakd once tines are extended to alleviate a public health Hazard, there. should <br />not be a prohibition on connection oCesscntiak public facilities. <br />The Board was kn agreement that the foklowing arc the unresolved issues: <br />i. Is the Town oC Iii[Isborough in or out and what does tliat mean?; <br />2. Does tlic [3oard agree that O~VASA s[wuld enter into an agreement to dcGnc the retail <br />service area?; <br /> <br />~. ~~' 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.