Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br />C. Joint Siting, Design and Management ofSchool and Park Sites. <br />Coordinating efforts and responsibilities with the Schools and Land -Use Councils <br />will be .important, given the emphasis from both groups on the benefits of joint <br />school/park development.: As discussed in the section on land acquisition, it is <br />recommended that Orange County, -with dedicated staff resources, a program fora <br />..land acquisition, and a role in school siting, should take the lead-role. <br />D. Pub/ic/P~ivate Partnerships <br />One of the most exciting prospects is the potential for partnerships. Coordination <br />between the local. governments. on future parks, such as a -large district parK <br />between Hillsborough and Chapel Hill/Carrboro, will be paramount. Opportunities <br />also exist with OWASA, and it is recommended that -the Parks and Resource <br />Lands Council work to identify properties for partnership and meet to explore <br />these possibilities, Coordination with UNC on future parks also appears-practical <br />and should be pursued.- .While Duke Forest is a different .type of recreational <br />entity, it plays an important role in the County's open space network and future <br />discussion of less-sensitive portions of the Forest as links in" the open space <br />network should be pursued. finally, opportunities for coordination with the state, <br />other land trusts and private firms offer many possibilities for future needs. <br />E. Joint Capital Facilities Planning /Coordinated Land Acquisition <br />A meeting of the Managers of each jurisdiction is recommended to develop a <br />plan for coordinating long-term land acquisition. With land prices continuing to <br />escalate and little land available for parks within the Town jurisdictions, action is <br />needed now to identify and acquire future park sites. Use of the individual <br />Capital Improvement Plans could- be a fundamental part of this :funding <br />mechanism. By timing and matching fund availability, -the Towns and County. will <br />be able to work together more effectively, with the County serving in a lead rote <br />in site 9dentilication and acquisition, working with the Parks and. Resource Lands <br />Council and the .individual elected boards. <br />F. Open Faci/ides Po/icy <br />In the spirit of inter-governmental coordination, the Work Group feels that all <br />County citizens should have the opportunity to use facilities within the County, <br />regardless. of their jurisdiction of residence. Attempts to .restrict use will ~ be <br />cumbersome administratively and not constructive in the, collaborative future of <br />parks planning. A resolution. to this end for consideration by the elected- boards is <br />found as Appendix" F. Pursuit of a similar policy with UNC and OWASA is <br />recommended, as is a review of hours of .operation at Cane Creek/University <br />Lake.. <br />G. Payment-in-Lieu Changes <br />After considerable discussion and review, the Work Group finds that the existing <br />payment-in-lieu programs are not likely to produce- sufficient funds to meet long- <br />6 <br />