Agenda - 09-14-1999 - 2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

CAwirKbwAtempUESSUP3.DOC 2 Printed: 06 /09/99 Found in the "Approve Budget" 3. The Board of Commissioners shall approve the 1999 -2000 solid Found in the "Approve Budget" waste management operating budget in June, 1999; paragraph near the bottom of page 2 paragraph near the bottom of page 2 * *Of course, this provision may be deleted from the final agreement if this action has occurred before the signing date 4. The LOG shall continue to oversee solid waste management, Found in Part 7 on page 7, and Found in Part 7 on page 7, and operating by consensus and making no major financial particularly the second paragraph of particularly the second paragraph of commitments, until it dissolves, after adoption of the 1999 -2000 Part 7 Found in Part 7 on page 7, and also in Part 7 Found in Part 7 on page 7, and also in budget and no later than August 1 1999; 5. Each government shall appoint two representatives to a Solid Waste Management Advisory Commission, pursuant to an adopted Exhibit C beginning on page 15 Exhibit C beginning on page 17 Interlocal Agreement, which shall succeed the LOG and begin meeting upon dissolution of the LOG and no later than August 1 1999; a ninth seat on the Commission will be reserved for a representative designated by the University, provided that the University commits to participation in the solid waste management system; 6. Solid waste collection /transportation decisions will remain the Found in Part 3 on page 3 Found in Part 3 on page 3 prerogative of each local government entity; 7. The County will pursue a conceptual revenue structure that: This provision is not separately Fees /revenues are discussed • Finances core operations (MRF, MSW and C &D Landfills) included, based in part on discussion at throughout Section 4 on pages 3, 4, 5 through tipping fees prior meeting at which other units and 6 • Finances collection /transportation activities through property indicated there was not need to tie the taxes and collection charges County to any particular methodology • Finances reduction /recycling through tipping fees to the extent practical, with the balance from availability fees 8. The County will finance community benefits through the landfill Found in Part 6 on pages 6 and 7 Found in Part 6 on pages 6 and 7 enterprise fund to the extent legally permissible (unless Carrboro and Chapel Hill agree to earmark a portion of one -cent sales taxes for their share of community benefits). FURTHERMORE The County is willing to entertain assumption by any of the other municipal partners of the lead role in solid waste management subject to the principles and conditions enumerated above. CAwirKbwAtempUESSUP3.DOC 2 Printed: 06 /09/99