Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-14-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 09-14-1999
>
Agenda - 09-14-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2009 12:26:25 PM
Creation date
3/10/2009 9:49:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/14/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990914
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Options for development of security checkpoint <br />The discussion regarding what the security checkpoint A.) should do, and B.) should look like, raised a <br />number of more complicated issues. There was significant discussion among the group about whether <br />the security checkpoint should be single purpose, or whether it was possible that it could be structured in <br />a manner to address multiple issues that presently exist in the building. <br />For example, the area in front of the large courtroom on the main floor stays congested because there is <br />no waiting area for those coming in and out of the courtroom. As a result,. people use the steps to sit <br />and wait, thereby causing a safety issue for people trying to move about the building. In addition, the <br />present "waiting area" makes it difficult to maintain an acceptable noise level to allow the court's <br />business to be conducted without intrusion. If the security checkpoint addition were to be a multiple <br />story structure, the design could alleviate this issue. <br />Further, should the Board so direct, the multiple story structure could be designed to include office <br />space. As earlier referenced, the. most pressing space issue in the Hillsborough courthouse is in support <br />space. Presumably, the Clerk's office staff could then be relocated to .the main courthouse from their <br />leased offices in the old Hillsborough_ Savings Bank. The annual lease payments for that facility are <br />approximately $61,000 at this time, which according to Ken Chavious, the County' Finance Director, <br />would cover approximately $600,000 in annual debt service payments. While construction costs of the <br />proposed structure would exceed this amount, it does represent a significant reduction in new money <br />needed to cover debt service costs for the entire new addition. <br />Site Master Plan for Hillsborough Court Facilities <br />To ensure that any money spent for building expansion is not lost in any future building additions to the <br />New Courthouse, it is advisable that it be constructed in a manner that would complement and tie <br />together future development on the site. In order to accomplish this, it seems prudent for the County to <br />have a site master plan for Hillsborough court facilities developed. While the 1995 report included some <br />observations about the site, a fully developed master plan is needed before making any long term <br />commitments to construction on the site. The master plan of the Hillsborough court campus would not <br />only identify possibilities for proposed buildings and parking facilities, it would also explore potential <br />development obstacles, such as limitations of the soil, site utility challenges, etc. According to a <br />proposal from the architectural firm who designed the recent additions to the Jail and courthouse, a <br />master plan could be completed and prepared for Board review in approximately six (6) weeks at an <br />approximate cost of $12,000. <br />Chapel Hill court facilities <br />The 1995 JFSG report indicated that there should be a satellite facility developed to meet court needs in <br />Chapel Hill. The report cited the County's property on Homestead Road as one potential location. At <br />the time the report was written it was believed that the long-term lease with the Post Office at the <br />Franklin Street court facility would preclude any expansion on that site in the foreseeable future. <br />However, during the security issues discussion, Town officials indicated that this might not be the case. <br />County and Court officials will continue dialogue with Town officials (Chapel Hill and Carrboro) to <br />determine what options are best for the long-term development of Court facilities in Chapel Hill. <br />For your information, court facilities encompass not only courtroom facilities, but also much needed <br />support space. As the Board is aware, the County expends considerable funds each year to lease <br />space to accommodate court functions. The 1999-2000 lease payments for court functions in the <br />southern part of the County is approximately $90,000. Court facility development in Chapel Hill would <br />most certainly need to include sufficient support space for long-term court needs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.