Orange County NC Website
aao~ 8 ~acE X00 <br />County Per Capita Levy <br />Cha el Hill School Su lement Tax <br />Total County and Supplement ,Levy Requested <br />905,561 (from 855,589) <br />1,598,487 (no change) <br />Amount to be Raised by Supplement 692,926 (from 731,898) <br />Assuming l¢ raises $29,000 - Supplement Tax Rate 4 23.89 cents <br />Chairman Walker questioned George Williams as to his reaction to the <br />proposal. Mr, Williams stated "his unit would be forced to cut out some of <br />its existing programs," Mrs. Mary Scroggs stated that the proposed cuts would <br />be disastrous for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools", <br />Commissioner Richard E, Whitted calciil.ated the proposed budget against <br />several per centages and various formulars were used in an effort to resolve <br />the matter of the tax rate. <br />Tha County.Accour_tant cautioned the Board about the problems that they <br />could encounter in the next fiscal year if proper financial safeguards were not <br />built into this years expenditures. <br />Dr, Sam Holton spoke in behalf of the proposed vocatienal program. He <br />urged the Hoard not to delete the expenditures needed for its implementation. $e <br />stated that the Chapel Hill Unit would also be forced to cut their proposed <br />kindergarten program. <br />Commissioner Richard E. Whitted said that he wsa opposed to any cuts in <br />the Capital Outlay budget request for either of the school units as h® felt <br />that these needs were going to have to be met sooner or later. <br />George Williams stated that his unit could stand some cuts in the Current <br />E7cpense budget but this would mean that the unit would riot be allowed to employ <br />an Assistant Superintendent of Schools nor would it allow for the increase in <br />the secretarial area. He stated that since the budget was presented that the <br />State had allowed some money for teachers and that his unit would accept the <br />$172.00 per child allocation that was being requested by the Chapel Hill- <br />Carrboro School System. <br />Mrs. Scroggs replied that the Chapel Hi11-Carrboro System had not received <br />any notifice:tion that they would be awarded any additional State funds. <br />P?r. Williams said that he wished the county would do away with the "carry- <br />over deal in the surplus as he feels it tends to confuse the budget situation. <br />There was no expression from the Chapel ?3ill-Carrboro Unit concerning the matter <br />of school surplus. <br />The Board made a survey as to the degree of Federal Funding that had been <br />withdrawn from the school systems and other governmental agencies. Tt was <br />determined that seven cents (7¢) of the proposed school budgets were caused <br />because of the decrease in Federal aid. <br />The Board deliberated as to how they could cut'over $300,000.00 from the <br />proposed 1973-1974 County Hudget. It was agreed that the funds for the County <br />Office Building, and the request for the construction of a new library facility <br />could account for approximately $225,000.00 of the needed $300,000.00. <br />The Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Unit agreed that they did not used the <br />entire amount of $S4p,000.00 in this years budget for the construction of the <br />vocational wing but that they did need a committment from the 3oard prior to <br />the letting of any contracts. Mrs. Scroggs stated that her Hoard would be willing <br />to accept a compromise of taking $135,000.00 out of this year~a Capital outlay <br />E,~pense Budget provided that the Board agreed that said amount would be allocated <br />in next year+a budget and that the said amount would no*_ be deducted from the <br />Capital Outlay FS~penae request of next year. The Board egreed to the compromise <br />that was offered by the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Unit. The County Administrator <br />said he would prepare the necessary legal instrument in order to allow the school <br />unit to let their bid. <br />The County Administrator was instructed by the Board to compute the per <br />centagea and other budget data that was necessary to chec:t the accuracy of what <br />had been agreed upon by the Hoard and that said information could be studied on <br />Wednesday night. <br />Commissioner Henry S. Walker questioned the County Administrator relative to <br />the new proposed Fire District Tax, Mr, Gattis stated that the ten cent (l0¢) <br />districts would receive five cents (5¢), and the fifteen cents (15~) districts <br />would receive seven cents (7~). <br />