Orange County NC Website
Tethering Committee, and he asked that the Board please appreciate his commitment to his <br /> dogs for over 50 years. He said that a law is out there now—the leash law—that is not being <br /> enforced now. <br /> Brian F. Fee read a prepared handout: <br /> "Dear Sirs: <br /> My name is Brian Fee and I live in Chapel Hill with my wife and three children. After <br /> many years of renting homes and apartments, we bought a home in Chapel Hill — one with a <br /> big yard for plants and animals. Last summer we were told about three puppies that were <br /> dropped off and abandoned at a minister's house. We adopted the puppy, which is part <br /> Labrador, part German Shepard.....but mostly mutt. Her name is Lily and the kids painted <br /> rainbows and lilies on her doghouse that I built. The agreement with my wife was that the dog <br /> would remain outside during the day on a line (a cable-trolley system) but remain inside in the <br /> evening and in a crate at night. Everything was working out fine....even as she has grown to <br /> 60 lbs...until I saw Dave Hart's editorial in the Chapel Hill News that brought up the tethering <br /> issue again. I was astonished that the issue of tethering was still being debated. <br /> Mr. Hart wrote that basically there were two distinct camps of thought—the anti- <br /> tethering group that says that tethering can cause physical or psychological damage to a dog, <br /> and a pro-tethering group, composed mainly of hunters and dog breeders who say that <br /> tethering is humane and that neglect by people is the real problem. It seemed like one major <br /> group — I would think they can be best called the silent majority— are families who have one or <br /> two dogs that are humanely tethered and are played with in their backyards. I was concerned <br /> enough that this group was not being represented that I stand here tonight. <br /> I read about how restrictions on tethering in other jurisdictions decreased dog bites, <br /> reduced unwanted litters, and reduced cruelty due to improper tethering. Well, our dog lives in <br /> our backyard, so even if she did have a mind to bit someone, which she hasn't had a mind to <br /> yet, the person would have to be in our backyard. She has been spayed, so puppies are not <br /> an issue. With regards to cruelty, Lily is a member of our family. Her tether has been installed <br /> properly and she always has food, water, shade, and room to run and dig. On this note, let's <br /> do some math. <br /> She is on a trolley line 60 feet long and she can go 19 feet each way from the center of <br /> the line. How many square feet can Lily play? <br /> The answer is 2280 square feet. Our house is only around 1500 square feet! This <br /> seems more humane than 100-200 square feet in a kennel or a 10-square foot crate. <br /> Attached to my talk is a picture of Lily's domain, where she can run, dig, and play— either with <br /> us or by herself— sleep....whatever she wants to do. By the way, we certainly interact with her <br /> much more on a line than we would with her stuck in a kennel. <br /> I believe the main issue is not how a dog is confined, but how well a pet owner takes <br /> care and interacts with an animal. Key words — pet owner responsibility. I'm all for it. I once <br /> found a dog....in a side yard....on a chain....with a collar that had grown into the dog's neck. I <br /> knocked on the owner's door, and they said that there wasn't a problem and that they were <br /> applying some sort of lotion to the neck....and then to get lost....or something like that. I called <br /> animal control ASAP and the dog was removed. The chain was not the problem — neglect <br /> was. I strongly support the laws against animal cruelty. <br /> This whole issue reminds me of gun control — some are adamantly against all guns and <br /> others start quoting the 2nd Amendment to have as many guns as they want. Neither side <br /> promotes gun-owner responsibility to solve the problem. <br /> Bottom line — our dog Lily is one of the vast majorities of dogs that are humanely <br /> tethered and cared for. I resent the fact that this proposed bill assumes that we are not taking <br /> care of our dog. I take responsibility for her care and safety. If any of you Commissioners <br /> wish to come over and visit Lily, just let me know." <br />