Orange County NC Website
Elaine Modlin read a prepared letter to the County Commissioners. She is an Animal <br /> Control Officer from Laurinburg, NC. <br /> "Dear Commissioners: <br /> The City of Laurinburg passed its first tethering ordinance in November, 1997 with an <br /> effective date of December 1998. The first ordinance allowed dog owners to tether their dogs <br /> for up to 8 hours within a 24-hour period. This proved to be too time-consuming to enforce, so <br /> in 2000 we amended the ordinance to one hour within a 24-hour period. <br /> We passed our tethering ordinance for two main reasons (1) the safety of our citizens <br /> and (2) for the humane treatment of animals. On the issue of safety, our records indicated that <br /> fifty-one percent of our dog bites were from dogs that were confined on chains or had been <br /> chained and had broken loose. This is compared to only 19 percent of bites from dogs that <br /> were confined in a fence. On the issue of inhumane treatment of animals, we were constantly <br /> receiving calls in reference to chained dogs. They were usually tangled up and unable to get <br /> to shelter or water. Many of these cases had been like this for long periods of time. Attempts <br /> to correct or eliminate these situations were futile and time-consuming. <br /> Passing this ordinance has definitely improved our records for protecting our citizens <br /> from dangerous dogs. It has helped eliminate residences with multiple dogs chained out, <br /> reducing such complaints as nuisance barking and odor. Our cruelty cases are significantly <br /> reduced as well as our dog bites from chained or loose dogs and complaints about dogs <br /> running loose. We have also seen a dramatic reduction in litters of puppies, partly because of <br /> the tethering ordinance, but also because of the state spay/neuter law. <br /> Although enforcing this ordinance had brought on extra work and time in the beginning, <br /> after almost 10 years our impoundments have been reduced by half. And most of these are <br /> strays, not owned by our citizens. It has been very rewarding seeing the addition of fenced in <br /> backyards and the dogs happily running around. Owners have commented to me that their <br /> dogs seem happier and easier to take care of. I hope that Orange County decides to pass a <br /> tethering ordinance, you will be making the lives of your residents safer and improving on the <br /> lives of many deserving dogs." <br /> Pat Sanford spoke at the last meeting and said that she is a member of the ASAB and <br /> she supports this amendment. All of the members of the ASAB are from Orange County. <br /> Sandi Coy is the Chairperson of Responsible Dog Owners of the Eastern States. She <br /> is also the new CEO of the United Responsible Dog Owners International. She is from <br /> Kentucky and was asked by residents of Orange County to come and speak. She said that <br /> she came tonight to try and set a few myths to bed. She said that laws of this sort are very <br /> difficult to enforce and they tend to give another law on the books that people are not going to <br /> follow. It is almost impossible to enforce, especially if there is a short limit for tethering. She <br /> said that a lot of the groups that try and start the anti-tethering movement have usually quoted <br /> a study done by the CDC, which was done in 1994 and is called, "Which Dogs Bites, a Case- <br /> Controlled Study of Risk Factors." This study was done on dogs that were taken in by Denver <br /> Metro Animal Services in 1991, so the study is already 17 years old. She said that the <br /> information is probably not still pertinent. Also, there were lots of exclusions in the study. The <br /> study started out with 991 dogs, and by the time the exclusions were done, the number was <br /> down to 357 dogs. She said that there are many flaws in this study. After this study was <br /> done, with all of the flaws, and the authors even said that the study was flawed, the Animal <br /> Rights Movement still uses it. She quoted something from the study: "One hundred and <br /> sixteen were aggressive when they were approached in their fence. Only 64 of the tethered <br /> dogs were aggressive. Our results, however, showed no significant difference in the behavior <br />