Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
36 <br /> Elements: <br /> • Make it working document <br /> • Prioritize elements and cost out to be most effective <br /> • Consider alternatives to consultant only re <br /> o Focus group with citizens <br /> o Grad students <br /> Process: <br /> • Check in points during report/periodically to ensure headed in right <br /> direction <br /> • Establish distribution list. <br /> • Trust <br /> • Transparent <br /> • Be sure all participants are aware of activities of BOCC <br /> • Reps from ES/Rescue <br /> History Not to Repeat <br /> • Ensure information is new and • No copies of report distributed <br /> valid • Who owned information? <br /> • Took information out of • Who was it to inform? <br /> stations • Flawed methodology <br /> • Information trivial • Objective selection <br /> • What was, not where we • Not transparent <br /> should go • Quality lousy <br /> • Ill-stated purpose • Not timely <br /> • Why created? <br /> • Use unclear <br /> Good Things about the Sage Report <br /> • Good attempt-bad result <br /> • A comparison for what is bad <br /> Next Steps: <br /> • Formulate draft RFP <br /> • Summary of sheets by next Thursday <br /> • Set standard meeting dates <br /> R view Committee Volunteers•? <br /> • Travis (Municipal) 4 Lynwood (Rural) J Wayne (Rural) <br /> Review Committee Alternates: <br /> • Jeff (Rural) i Kevin (Rural) Dan (Municipal) <br />