Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 03-03-2009
>
Agenda - 03-03-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2016 12:17:33 PM
Creation date
3/4/2009 12:17:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090303
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> NPS Nutrient Who What <br /> Source <br /> 1 -Agriculture LAC/ERCD Local advisory, committees implement BMP's <br /> 2-Nutrient Management DWQ Training for fertilizer or bio-solids applicators <br /> 3-NPDES Phase 11 P&I Apply Phase II to all local municipalities—County <br /> inclusion is uncertain <br /> 4—Storm Water Rule: EC New development would require BMP's <br /> Jurisdictions required to build storm water retrofits <br /> 5—Trading P& I Ability to develop trading or other nutrient loading <br /> offset options between and among point and <br /> non-point sources <br /> 6-Forestry EC Pre-harvest notification.Selective buffer harvesting <br /> 7-Adaptive Management P& I Evaluate progress of NMS and adjust. <br /> 8 Buffer Protection EC Expand buffer rules from Neuse &Tar-Pamlico <br /> 9 Wastewater Land Appl. DWQ Investigate strengthening its permitting program <br /> 10-On-Site Wastewater DWQ/EH Work with Environmental Health—reduce N+P from <br /> IWWS <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that these strategies track a number of goals that the County <br /> Commissioners have and he would suggest the notion that the County should be able to have <br /> the authority to regulate those systems as opposed to the State regulating them. He was <br /> interested in Mayor Dell's letter back to the County about conservation where he mentioned <br /> trading credits. He would like to talk.to Durham about how they are going to compensate <br /> people in the Little River area for protecting their water supply. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that the County should not wait another four years to study <br /> this because there could be a different regulatory environment. <br /> Commissioner Halkiotis asked if the agricultural community was aware of all of this and <br /> Dave Stancil said that they are becoming aware of it Commissioner Halkiotis said that this is <br /> going to be horrific. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she wonders how hard this will fall on Orange County. <br /> It strikes her that there are massive pollutants going in, but Orange County will bear the burden... <br /> She is not sure what the County can say between now and May 31a. <br /> Dave Stencil said that this is falling into two camps. The Citizens for Clean Water and. <br /> the Haw River Assembly have been very supportive of DWQ's"proposed rules. The impacts, in <br /> terms of new development and existing development, might fall heaviest on the urban areas. <br /> They are very concerned about the impacts on new development. It might require Durham, <br /> Chapel Hill, and Carrboro retrofitting their storm water controls in existing developments. <br /> OWASA,the City of Durham,and other providers are going to want to take it slower because it <br /> might not do what is needed for the water supply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.