Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br /> • All About + • • • 4 - take <br /> • •"New Additional Allocat on <br /> •Benefits • Challenges/Problems <br /> • Ideas • <br /> You The tear+ • Without additional allocation, <br /> • Additional intake on cheaper for Durham to buy <br /> Jordan- good for region from Cary <br /> • Redundancy & A larger allocation leads to ' • Success on Jordan Lake • Allocation process will face <br /> interconnections lower capital costs "per as a regional approach downstream/upstream <br /> • Regional approach has , t" -money can be can benefit other regional skepticism- need <br /> stronger appeal for ocated to other needs strategies collaboration/ coordination/ <br /> allocation / regulatory (envir.nmental ■ -n-fits) • Thi, = , • Id be e-.= ,just education-Cary IBT <br /> process- aggregated • Maybe , , , . en" ke,p hi ! •c•the right • DWR may struggle with a <br /> approach �velopme,• s A-.7"•".. tur ' e io focus, complex/politically charged•• Waiting for an intake adds of tlii: n p e , . • . . government & allocation request- need to <br /> regulatory complexity and (especially h h. ro► • ASA needs to be part "put a bow around it" <br /> c-St - much more' cult large ones) o;project-focus on loc c+ • Complex finance & <br /> 0-2 3. years from no W,,, • Need to build in Head. . y-in for OWASA management issues for intake <br /> .• intake can sa, a (including water treatment?) <br /> A re onal <br /> ,� �` for both intake & • embers <br /> / money- move • ster and allocation- needs may ,ok for intake AND • Allocation will face <br /> share costs change (denser ,ater treatment environmental concerns- , <br /> • Jordan e / intake could development?) ,artnership (save advocates will be skeptic- <br /> simplify the •omplex issues Strong link with smart -nergy/money) • Political push for "unif. ,'p." <br /> of IBT, r e e pressure on • growth, the allocation & Find some modest practices and rates oss <br /> Michie intake management "success" early- public :1J on, growth ,. y agemen <br /> agreement and political energy for • The . 1 ion process coul• • <br /> • Chatham NEEDS water for success bog down with "water grab" <br /> economy and growth - attitudes <br /> maybe include Pittsboro? <br /> \ fountalnwo, <br />