Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-10-2009 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 02-10-2009
>
Agenda - 02-10-2009 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2009 4:44:33 PM
Creation date
2/6/2009 4:43:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/10/2009
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090210 Work Session
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />PLAi~hill~G PRC~J~~7 P[~~P~SAL ~#8 -~ ~o~rember 208 <br />Lead Departmert: Planning & Inspections <br />[primary Gontact(s}: Michael Harvey X245-2547); Karen Lincoln (245-2594}, <br />Jennifer Leaf {24~-203) <br />Department Interaction: Administration and County Attorney <br />S+~bject: Assessmerrt of Reg~tlataryr Issues: Drive-thrus, ~raral <br />Traffic ilrnpacts, Racal Liightiing llmpa~cts <br />T3I1CltGRaU N D <br />aver. the last few months, various development proposals arkdlor complaints have <br />uncx}vPred facets of our, existing regulations fhat may be in rraed of re-examination. <br />Sarre of th+~ lanr~ development standards do not difierentiate between urban and rural <br />intensity levels. New arEViranmental concerns of ald methods of business such as drive- <br />thrus may neec4~to be reflected ire green site development regulations. <br />ISSk.fi": <br />[]rive-t3~rus -During the review of the Buckhorrr Village f~lannect Qeveiopment, conccerns <br />arose over [fie development and use of drive-ta~rt~ fs,c~ities within i'he project, and throughout <br />the County as a whole. <br />The Grange County ~onirYg Ordinance does not cDntain any reference to specific design <br />crr~eria, or language establishing an outright ban, an the development of such faciiitiQS {with <br />~e exception of the Hsllsbomugh Economic peveiopment Districty. <br />PRf?P~AI- Staf# believes there pro two ~2~ t~ptaons available if the County, decides to <br />regulate drive-thrus, specifically: <br />OPTIiQ~I A: The ardittanLe can be amended to include a prvhlbitian on ~e <br />development a# drive-thr+~ facilities far eny and ali nary-residential asps ~ciuding, but <br />ntrt iimited to: restaurants, banks, drug storasr dry cleaners; etc. This prohibition <br />Would be located within Article Six {6) APplicatio~ of f~imensronaf f~eq~.rRrcments of <br />the Ordinance. <br />4PYIaN B: Tice Ordinance could lie amsr<ded to include specific design criteria <br />designed to address the ancillary impacts of these types of accessory uses. <br />p~tOCE3SlTltVIELiNE: <br />Stafif intends to present bath options for review and possible actiof~ by the BOCC at the <br />February 249 Quarterly Pulalic Hearing with staff proposals to the Planning Board <br />4rdlnance Review Committee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.