Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-03-2009 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 02-03-2009
>
Agenda - 02-03-2009 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2016 10:50:10 AM
Creation date
1/30/2009 3:34:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/3/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090203
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> Additional Issues Unresolved Post December 11 — Termination Rights and Flare <br /> Revenues <br /> In general terms, the proposed Agreement states the County will grant UNC the rights to the <br /> landfill gas ("LFG.") generated at the Eubanks Road Landfill. UNC will construct a system to <br /> collect, transport, and combust such LFG, initially through flaring and then through electricity <br /> generation. In exchange for the LFG rights, UNC will make monthly payments to the County <br /> based on a percentage of the heating energy value of LFG that UNC has flared and used to <br /> generate electricity. UNC is responsible for all costs and operating responsibilities associated <br /> with the LFG Project. Attachment 1A and 1B is the Proposed Agreement. Attachment 2 is the <br /> Pro forma documents. <br /> The proposed Agreement, in its current draft, remains problematic regarding the County's rights <br /> (termination or otherwise) in the event UNC fails to construct either the Gas Collection or Gas <br /> Conversion components of the landfill gas system. County staff previously understood UNC's <br /> negotiated position to be that the County could terminate the Agreement if UNC had not <br /> commenced operation of both the LFG Collection System and the Gas Conversion System <br /> within five (5) years of the parties' execution of the Agreement. <br /> However, in discussions between the parties after the December 11, 2008 BOCC meeting, UNC <br /> clarified its position (as reflected in the proposed Agreement) that the five (5)-year termination <br /> deadline would run from the date of the issuance of the last permit, easement, or other approval <br /> necessary to construct the LFG Collection system and the Gas Conversion System — not from <br /> the date the parties signed the Agreement. <br /> UNC further took the position any upward adjustments to the revenue the County would receive <br /> from gas flaring that might result from their delay in constructing either the Gas Collection or <br /> Gas Conversion System would not take effect until a period of time similarly running from the <br /> date of the issuance of the last permit, easement, or other approval necessary to construct the <br /> Gas Conversion System — not from the date the parties signed the Agreement. <br /> Staff is concerned the positions held by UNC do not provide the County with a meaningful <br /> remedy in the event UNC does not receive the necessary permits, easements, or approvals to <br /> authorize the construction of the Gas Conversion System. Under such circumstances there <br /> would not be any event to trigger a deadline that would provide the County with recourse to <br /> either adjust upward the percentage of revenue paid to the County for the flaring of LFG or to <br /> terminate the Agreement in the event UNC failed to construct the Gas Conversion System. <br /> This is not merely an academic concern because UNC may face very real hurdles in obtaining <br /> the approvals necessary to construct the Gas Conversion System. Attachment 3 is a memo <br /> from County Engineering on the subject easements through the Southern Human Services <br /> Center Campus. <br /> The County has explained its concerns extensively to UNC and attempted to negotiate a <br /> mutually-acceptable solution. UNC has participated fully in the dialog but ultimately indicated its <br /> position was final and non-negotiable. Attachment 4 is a memo from UNC that County staff <br /> requested to state their rationale regarding termination as well as prospects for receiving <br /> additional off-setting revenue for project development. <br /> While the County has no reason to believe UNC will not proceed to implement the two phases <br /> of the project in a timely manner, including pursuing the necessary easements, the proposed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.