Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-03-2009 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 02-03-2009
>
Agenda - 02-03-2009 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2016 10:50:10 AM
Creation date
1/30/2009 3:34:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/3/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090203
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> Response to Questions from the BOCC on December 11 <br /> 1) What are the possible impacts of the landfill gas transmission lines and other associated <br /> facilities on the proposed men's shelter at the former Duke Energy facility? <br /> Regarding possible impacts of the gas line and other associated facilities, UNC has indicated it <br /> will meet all environmental requirements as dictated by the State of North Carolina Department <br /> of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Air Quality, and the Town of Chapel Hill <br /> noise ordinance. Based on the proposed area to be leased to the Town of Chapel Hill and the <br /> projected site for the landfill gas generator, the distance between the shelter and the generator <br /> will be as much as 400 to 500 feet. UNC has been in contact with Chris Moran, Executive <br /> Director of the Interfaith Council (IFC) and the IFC architectural consultant, Josh Gurlitz, to <br /> begin discussion of mutual compliance and compatibility issues. To date, no substantial <br /> problems have been identified for the planned relocation of the IFC Men's Shelter relative to the <br /> planned transmission lines or associated LFG facilities. <br /> 2) Why is there an ability to put landfill gas lines through the Greene Tract, but inability to <br /> put water and sewer lines through the Greene Tract? <br /> Orange County, Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough and the Orange Water and Sewer Authority <br /> are parties to a Water and Sewer Management, Planning and Boundary Agreement (the "Water <br /> and Sewer Agreement"). This Agreement, among other things, places limitations on extension <br /> of water and sewer service in certain areas of the County. The Greene Tract is located within <br /> an OWASA Primary Service Area as defined in the Water and Sewer Agreement. The Water <br /> and Sewer Agreement permits extension of water and sewer service through the Greene Tract. <br /> In fact, the Town of Chapel Hill's Rogers Road Small Area Plan Task Force recommendations <br /> anticipate these utilities will be made available to the jointly owned portion of the Greene Tract <br /> (no development of the County owned portion of the Greene Tract is now contemplated). <br /> 3) What are the potential uses for the new revenues to the County from UNC for landfill <br /> gas? <br /> The timeline of implementation for the project make it unlikely that any substantive revenue will <br /> be received from this project for perhaps 3-5 years. Moreover, significant additional <br /> expenditures from the enterprise fund are coming up and require funding, including: <br /> • landfill closure costs and new operations center debt service <br /> • costs of possible implementation of the Solid Waste Planning Work Group <br /> recommendations (expected in late spring 2009) <br /> • transfer station land acquisition and development costs (including potential new <br /> expenditures generated by the new transfer station community advisory group) <br /> • significantly increased operating costs associated with operating a remote waste <br /> transfer facility including hauling and disposal costs. <br /> In addition, recyclable material markets have recently experienced significant reductions in <br /> prices paid resulting in less revenue to offset operational expenses. It is therefore unlikely there <br /> will be surplus revenues to fund new ventures or obligations and more than likely the solid <br /> waste enterprise fund will be challenged to maintain financial integrity through its current landfill <br /> to transfer station transition period. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.