Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-03-2009 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 02-03-2009
>
Agenda - 02-03-2009 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2016 10:50:10 AM
Creation date
1/30/2009 3:34:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/3/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090203
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A ffoch (nen+ 3133 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> HILLSBOROUGH <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> ranayer's Olke Orla67 ed/7J2 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Ray DuBose,UNC Energy Services <br /> COPIES: Gwen Harvey,Assistant County Manager <br /> Gayle Wilson, Solid Waste Director <br /> Brian Ferrell,Attorney for Orange County <br /> Pam Jones,Purchasing Director <br /> David Stancil,ERCD Director <br /> John Masson,UNC Facilities Planning ,/ ( - <br /> FROM: R.Kevin Lindley,PE,Engineering Specialist I .0 / I. i • <br /> DATE: 12/31/08 <br /> SUBJECT: Easements for UNC's proposed Landfill Gas Pipeline Project <br /> This memo contains my understanding of the various outstanding issues regarding the granting of <br /> easements across Orange County(the"County")owned property for the proposed Landfill Gas(LFG) <br /> project. In general,there are two areas that will be addressed. First,there are issues that UNC will <br /> resolve with entities other than the County regarding the routing of the LFG pipeline and/or ductbank. <br /> Second, a discussion'of how the granting mg of <br /> the easements will be handled by-tle County. <br /> It is my understanding from the conversations with John Masson and the various engineers working on <br /> this project for UNC that there are some unresolved issues concerning the routing of the proposed <br /> easements. To begin with,the proposed easement would cross an area designated by the Town of <br /> Chapel Hill as a"Resource Conservation District"(RCD) `At last check,there was a question as to <br /> whether crossing the RCD-would be allowed,due to the disturbance that would be caused in the area. <br /> The second issue involves a condition of the Special Use Permit(SUP)that the County was required to <br /> obtain for the Southern Human Services Center and the Seymour Center. The SUP requires a vegetative <br /> buffer of a specified width and type between Homestead Road and the rest of the County's property. <br /> Currently,there is enough room to satisfy these buffer requirements and locate the easement on County <br /> property. However,the Department of Transportation(DOT)has indicated their desire to widen <br /> Homestead Road in the future. The widened road would not allow enough space between the proposed <br /> LFG easement and Homestead Rd.to maintain the required buffer width. Thus,the County would be in <br /> violation of their SUP with the Town of Chapel Hill. Both of these are issues that UNC needs to resolve <br /> with the Town of Chapel Hill(with input from DOT)prior to formally requesting easements from the <br /> . Board of County Commissioners(BOCC). Unless these two issues with the Town can be resolved,the <br /> currently proposed routing of an easement across County property on Homestead Road will be <br /> problematic. <br /> AREA CODE (919) 245-2300 • 688-7331 • FAX (919) 644-3004 <br /> Ext. 2300 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.