Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment 4 <br /> Excerpt of Draft Minutes <br /> 1 MINUTES <br /> 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 3 JANUARY 14,2009 <br /> 4 REGULAR MEETING <br /> 5 <br /> 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Crawford, Eno Township At-Large (Chair); Jay Bryan, Chapel Hill Representative (Vice- <br /> 7 Chair); Rachel Phelps Hawkins, Hillsborough Representative; Jeffrey Schmitt, Cedar Grove Township; Tommy <br /> 8 McNeill, Eno Township Representative; Mary Bobbitt-Cooke, Cheek Township Representative; Larry Wright, Cedar <br /> 9 Grove Township At-Large; Samantha Cabe, Chapel Hill Township At-Large; <br /> 10 <br /> 11 MEMBERS ABSENT: Joel Forrest Knight, Little River Representative; Nathan Chambers, Cheeks Township At-Large; <br /> 12 Bingham Township;Vacant;At-Large,Vacant <br /> 13 <br /> 14 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Robert Davis, Current Planning Supervisor, Michael Harvey, <br /> 15 Planner II; Perdita Holtz, Special Projects Coordinator; Shannon Berry, Special Projects Planner, Tina Love, <br /> 16 Administrative Assistant II <br /> 17 <br /> 18 OTHERS PRESENT: Margo Pinkerton,Citizen;Jo Soulier, Citizen <br /> 19 <br /> 20 (Document with subject line "Vernon Davis NC 54 rezoning request" was passed out by staff from Steve Yuhasz, <br /> 21 Attorney for Vernon Davis) <br /> 22 <br /> 23 (Due to recorder malfunction there are no recorded minutes. The following is a summary of meeting from written <br /> 24 notes and staff) <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 29 AGENDA ITEM 10: ENO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT(EDD)AREA SMALL AREA PLAN <br /> 30 To consider a recommendation to the BOCC regarding the text revision to the Eno EDD Area <br /> 31 Small Area Plan heard at the November 24, QPH. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Presenter: Shannon Berry, Special Projects Planner <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Shannon Berry gave a presentation. In September the Eno EDD Task Force met to discuss the residential limits <br /> 36 within the Mixed Use district. Task force members concurred with staffs recommendation of limiting the acreage for <br /> 37 new residential development to 25%of the total land area within the Mixed Use district. In addition,they agreed with <br /> 38 the added provision of allowing residential units constructed above non-residential uses to not count toward the 25% <br /> 39 residential acreage limit. It was then heard at the November 24th quarterly public hearing. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 MOTION by Larry Wright to revise the definition of the Eno Mixed Use proposed land use category to specify an <br /> 42 acreage limit for residential development within the Mixed Use area as recommended by staff for the Eno EDD small <br /> 43 area plan. Seconded by Mary Bobbitt-Cooke. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 VOTE: Unanimous <br /> 46 <br /> 47 <br /> 1 <br />