Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-27-2009 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 01-27-2009
>
Agenda - 01-27-2009 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2016 8:28:20 AM
Creation date
1/26/2009 3:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/27/2009
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090127
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> of the County (including Mebane) is in the Haw River Arm, where 8% reductions in nitrogen and <br /> 5% reductions in phosphorus are proposed. <br /> As outlined in the staff report, some key issues, challenges or opportunities to be aware of <br /> include: <br /> • The potential cost (as yet undetermined) of retrofitting existing development to meet the <br /> reductions. <br /> • The potential to have to overtreat new development stormwater if existing development <br /> reductions are not met. <br /> • The potential for nutrient trading and offsets — where an opportunity may exist for the <br /> County to use existing programs to offset and/or mitigate nutrient-loading. <br /> • The potential difficulty in meeting a 35% nitrogen reduction in the Upper New Hope, <br /> which is heavily forested and is expected to have a low loading rate. <br /> • The County's long history of watershed protection, on-site infiltration of stormwater and <br /> non-structural controls may serve to greatly lessen the impact on the County and citizens <br /> in the County's jurisdiction. <br /> • Many local governments have made comments to the State that substantial funding <br /> assistance is needed to accomplish the implementation of these rules. <br /> • The rules may face opposition from several quarters in the General Assembly this spring. <br /> The first milestones for implementing the Jordan Lake Rules, assuming their adoption, is still <br /> two years distant and the full implementation and nutrient reduction is planned to be <br /> accomplished over a decade - or slightly longer. However, the potential costs of implementation <br /> are unknown and perhaps substantial, and the potential benefits will require significant further <br /> discussion and planning. With these challenges and benefits on the horizon, an early start <br /> toward planning for the implementation may be prudent once final action is taken. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: The full costs of implementing the Jordan Lake Rules are not presently <br /> known, but have been estimated between $230 million - $530 million for all local governments <br /> in the watershed over the full term. Orange County's jurisdiction is more rural, and County <br /> subdivision regulations have long focused on on-site infiltration and non-structural measures to <br /> reduce nutrient loading. This fact should work to reduce the County's potential implementation <br /> cost, but the degree to which this is true will not be known until more data is received about <br /> existing nutrient loading rates. <br /> Future Capital Investment Plans may need to reflect implementation measures during the <br /> period 2011-2020 once more is known about the costs of implementing the rules. As the rules <br /> progress toward enactment, staff will continue during the coming year to assess and evaluate <br /> the actual costs associated with implementation. <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board receive the staff report and <br /> discuss the implications and related issues and provide feedback and direction as needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.