Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-27-2009 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 01-27-2009
>
Agenda - 01-27-2009 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2016 8:16:39 AM
Creation date
1/26/2009 3:01:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/27/2009
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090127
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> All About l take <br /> -New/Additional Allocation <br /> • genefits • Ideas • Challenges/Problems <br /> You The team • Without additional allocation, <br /> • Additional intake on cheaper for Durham to buy <br /> Jordan- good for region from Cary <br /> • Redundancy& A larger allocation leads to ' • Success on Jordan Lake • Allocation process will face <br /> interconnections lower capital costs "per as a regional approach downstream/upstream <br /> • Regional approach has • t" -money can be can benefit other regional skepticism- need <br /> stronger appeal for ocated to other needs strategies collaboration/ coordination/ <br /> allocation / regulatory (envir•nmental • -n-fits) • Thi, - • ld bee ,just education- Cary IBT <br /> process- aggregated • Maybe • • t "gr en" ke,p •ushi , the right • DWR may struggle with a <br /> approach developmeuks = : -.:tur • e iocus, _ complex/politically charged <br /> • Waiting for an intake adds of thil-new p e = • • • • k government & allocation request- need to <br /> regulatory complexity and (especially I141 pro le • 'ASA needs to be part "put a bow around it" <br /> cos much more ifficult large ones) • Complex finance & <br /> years from now g ) o'project -focus on loc:� P i.y \ • Need to build in fiexi• U . • y-in for OWASA management issues for intake <br /> ,:/0-2 <br /> regional intake can sage for both intake & • embers (including water treatment?) <br /> / money- move faster and allocation- needs may •ok for intake AND • Allocation will face <br /> share costs change (denser environmental concerns- <br /> • Jordan e / intake could g ( ater treatment <br /> development?) •artnership (save advocates will be skeptic <br /> simplify the r omplex issues • Strong link with smart -nergy/money) • Political push for "unif. " <br /> of IBT, r lie a pressure on growth, the allocation & Find some modest practices and rates . oss <br /> Michie intake management "success" early- public :• on, growth I,FA agemen <br /> agreement and political energy for • The - I • . r on process coul• <br /> • Chatham NEEDS water for 1 success bog down with "water grab" <br /> economy and growth - attitudes <br /> maybe include Pittsboro? <br /> i N <br /> fountainwor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.