Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-22-2009 - 4h
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 01-22-2009
>
Agenda - 01-22-2009 - 4h
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
1/21/2009 9:45:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/22/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4h
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090122
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> potentially complex contracts. The RFP was issued following this Statute which allows for <br /> award to be made to the "best overall" proposal. <br /> Thirteen potential vendors were sent the RFP and it was advertised in the Durham Herald and <br /> on the County website. From the RFP, three vendors responded. The stakeholder departments <br /> and Purchasing met extensively with each of the three responding vendors. The vendors' <br /> responses and functional demonstrations were evaluated against the functional requirements. <br /> On the basis of the analysis of the responses, the departments of Tax Assessor, Revenue and <br /> Information Technologies are recommending the County pursue a solution which uses the <br /> Patriot Systems' of Boston, Massachusetts AssessPro product and the North Carolina <br /> Association of County Commissioners' (NCACC) North Carolina Property Tax System (NCPTS) <br /> product, administered by Intelligent Information Systems, Inc. (IIS) of Durham, North Carolina. <br /> These two software applications together represent a solution that is the lowest risk, highest <br /> benefit among the various responses received and best overall solution for Orange County. <br /> Because of the broad scope, cost and complexity of implementing a new Land Records and <br /> Taxation system, the departments of the Tax Assessor, Revenue, Purchasing and Information <br /> Technologies seek approval to begin detailed contractual negotiations with the two vendors. <br /> Further, the stakeholder departments request to contract with a firm specializing in technology <br /> contracts. The County Attorney's Office is prepared to provide an initial level of review in <br /> upcoming negotiations, but since contracting for information technologies is notoriously complex <br /> with high risk factors, and critical deadlines have been defined for optimal project launch, staff <br /> believes specialized consulting will mitigate the inherent risks of such a critical project. The legal <br /> consultant, working with staff and the County Attorney, will ensure the contractual obligations of <br /> the vendors are clearly delineated and legally enforceable. <br /> The Information Technology Advisory Committee has discussed and will continue to discuss the <br /> PIMS project. The Committee reviewed a status report with the recommendation of a <br /> specialized legal counsel. The members of the committee in attendance concurred with these <br /> needs in order to proceed with the project. <br /> The firm of Barry Strock Consulting Associates, Inc. is uniquely qualified for performing these <br /> consulting services. Specializing in local government technology contract development, this firm <br /> has significant experience in North Carolina County government tax and land records systems. <br /> Further, the firm is familiar with the vendors Orange County has selected and has a detailed <br /> understanding of the technical challenges that other, less experienced vendors would devote <br /> resources to achieve. <br /> Further details and costs of implementing the Property Information Management System will be <br /> determined on the basis of the negotiations and submitted for Board approval at a future date. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: Barry Strock Consulting Associates, Inc. has quoted a price of $45,000 <br /> to develop multi-vendor contracts encompassing development, implementation, training, <br /> acceptance and ongoing maintenance. Further vendor costs for implementing the Property <br /> Information Management System will be delineated and submitted for approval in future Board <br /> presentations. <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board approve the contract with <br /> Barry Strock Consulting Associates, Inc. and authorize the Chair to sign the contract pending <br /> final approval by staff and the County Attorney. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.