Orange County NC Website
<br />Thomas E. warren, Chief Warrant officer, US Army <br />P. Troop, 4th Squadron <br />3rd Armored Calvary Regiment <br />Fort Bliss, Texas <br />October 1, 1990 - April 1991 <br />3 V. SPECIAL PRE6ENTATION& - NONE <br />_ VI. <br /> <br /> <br />L <br />~~ <br />3 <br />4 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />0 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />0 <br /> <br />9 <br />PITBLIC HEA~~NGS <br />~, PROP06ED AMEND ENTS 'I'0 WAT~,R AND g~W~R POLICY. ZONING <br />QRDINANCE _AND SUBDIYISION REGULATIONS <br />Bill Waddell chaired this portion oP the meeting since this <br />public hearing involved the Planning Board. <br />The purpose of this item was to receive citizen comment on the <br />proposed amendments to the Water and Sewer Policy, Zoning Ordinance, and <br />Subdivision Regulations which would allow water and/or sewer agreements <br />which predated the County~s Water and Sewer Policy to be carried out in <br />the Rural Buffer and Water Quality Critical., Areas. More speciff.c, in <br />early April, a landowner in the Protected Watershed port~.on of the <br />University Lake Watershed in the Rural Buffer inquired about developing <br />an 18-acre parcel. He presented an agreement which he and his wife had <br />signed with OWASA in 1983 for the purpose of conveying a parcel of land <br />as a pump station location in exchange for five water and five sewer <br />taps. The landowners would now like to use the taps and develop their <br />property. OWASA officials have stated that-they have no knowledge of <br />other similar agreements for water and/or sewer service. The proposed <br />amendment would add language tv the Water and. Sewer Policy to allow pre- <br />existing written service agreements to be honored. The second part of <br />the amendment would make the Interim Development Standards in the Zoning <br />Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations consistent with the amendment to <br />the Water and Sewer Policy. The 'Planning Staff recommends approval of <br />the proposed amendments. There were no citizen comments. <br />Motion was made by commissioner cordon, seconded by <br />Commissioner Halkiotis to refer this item to the Planning Board for a <br />recommendation to be considered by the County commissioners na sooner <br />than September 3, 1991. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />vrz. ~pORTg <br />,~ B'TATE WATERSHED PROTECTION - PROCEDURES AND YMP ICATIONS FOB <br />ORANdE QOUNTY ~ ~: . <br />The County Commissioners received a report from Planner David <br />stencil on the implications of 'state watershed protection rules and <br />classifications on current County po~.icies/procedures. The <br />Environmental Management Commission (EMCj has proposed preliminary <br />classifications.for each of orange County's it water supply watersheds. <br />The report prepared by the Planning staff (1) explains the mandate <br /> <br />*, <br />